You are here
Home ›simplest common equation of conics
Primary tabs
simplest common equation of conics
In the plane, the locus of the points having the ratio of their distances from a certain point (the focus) and from a certain line (the directrix) equal to a given constant , is a conic section, which is an ellipse, a parabola or a hyperbola depending on whether is less than, equal to or greater than 1.
For showing this, we choose the -axis as the directrix and the point as the focus. The locus condition reads then
This is simplified to
| (1) |
If , we obtain the parabola
In the following, we thus assume that .
Setting in (1) we see that the -axis cuts the locus in two points with the midpoint of the segment connecting them having the abscissa
We take this point as the new origin (replacing by ); then the equation (1) changes to
| (2) |
From this we infer that the locus is
1. 2.
Polar equation
Place the origin into a focus of a conic section (and in the cases of ellipse and hyperbola, the abscissa axis through the other focus). As before, let be the distance of the focus from the corresponding directrix. Let and be the polar coordinates of an arbitrary point of the conic. Then the locus condition may be expressed as
Solving this equation for the polar radius yields the form
| (3) |
for the common polar equation of the conic. The sign alternative () depends on whether the polar axis () intersects the directrix or not.
Mathematics Subject Classification
51N20 Euclidean analytic geometry- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


