upper set operation is a closure operator
In this entry, we shall prove the assertion made in
the main entry (http://planetmath.org/UpperSet) that
is a closure operator. This will be done by checking
that the defining properties are satisfied. To begin,
recall the definition of our operation
![]()
:
Definition 1.
Let be a poset and a subset of . The upper set of is defined to be the set
Now, we verify each of the properties which is required of a closure operator.
Theorem 1.
Proof.
Any statement of the form “”
is identically false no matter what the predicate![]()
(i.e. it is
an antitautology) and the set of objects satsfying an identically
false condition is empty, so .
∎
Theorem 2.
Proof.
This follows from reflexivity![]()
— for every , one has
, hence .
∎
Theorem 3.
Proof.
By the previous result, . Hence, it only remains to show that . This follows from transitivity. In order for some to be an element of , there must exist and such that and . By transitivity, , so , hence as well. ∎
Theorem 4.
If and are subsets of a partially ordered set![]()
, then
Proof.
On the one hand, if , then for some . It then follows that either or . In the former case, , in the latter case, so, either way . Hence .
On the other hand, if , then either or . In the former case, there exists such that and . Since , we also have , hence . Likewise, in the second case, we also conclude that . Therefore, we have . ∎
Theorem 5.
Theorem 6.
,
| Title | upper set operation is a closure operator |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | UpperSetOperationIsAClosureOperator |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:41:43 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:41:43 |
| Owner | rspuzio (6075) |
| Last modified by | rspuzio (6075) |
| Numerical id | 8 |
| Author | rspuzio (6075) |
| Entry type | Theorem |
| Classification | msc 06A06 |