You are here
Home ›wreath product
Primary tabs
wreath product
Let and be groups, and let act on the set . Define the action of on the direct product by
for any and . The wreath product of and according to the action of on , denoted , is the semidirect product of groups .
Let us pause to unwind this definition. The elements of are ordered pairs , where and . The group operation is given by
Note that by definition of the action of on ,
The action of on in the semidirect product permutes the elements of a tuple , and the group operation defined on gives pointwise multiplication. To be explicit, suppose is an -tuple, and let . Let denote . Then
Notice the permutation of the indices in (*).
A moment’s thought to understand this slightly messy notation will be illuminating, and might also shed some light on the choice of terminology.
Mathematics Subject Classification
20E22 Extensions, wreath products, and other compositions- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new correction: typo? by Filipe
May 22
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by Aleph Zero
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by unlord
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
Corrections
broken by bbukh ✓
action of G on A^\Gamma by pbruin ✓
Notation and typo by bbukh ✓
line too long by yark ✓



Comments
I just want to say...
That I'm glad to finally write an entry that has no parallel in Mathworld.
Wreath products are curious beasts. Is anyone interested in hearing more about them? I'm considering expanding this entry if anyone's listening.
Re: I just want to say...
Yes, please write more on wreath products. I remember constructions based on wreath products coming up as examples in various courses in the dim distant past.
Re: I just want to say...
Helo!
I'm very interested in wreath product, expecially connected with games. Rubic cube and it's versions. Have you anything for it?
Re: I just want to say...
Please write more!
Re: I just want to say...
HI,
I'm in interested in the structure of the wreath product,
but to be fair more interested in a generalised version
of the wreath product due to Dixon and Fournelle. Here, the
permutation groups are ordered by a, possibly infinite,
partially ordered set. Just wondering what you can sat about
this.
Cheers,
Dom.
Re: I just want to say...
Hi!
I try to work with wreath products in my diploma thesis. Whenever I talk to my prof, he seems to have a lot of pictures about them in his head. His hands are always in action taking elements from one component to another, drawing a diagonal when he speaks about the diag. subgroup, and so on.
My problem about that is, that in my head there is no such picture and so he rather confuses me from time to time.
By now I've read quite a lot about wreath products, but all I can find is technical definitions and theorems.
I mean if everybody who works with wreath products has such pictures in his head, why does nobody put them down on paper? It would make it much easier for newcomers to find themselves a way into the theme.
Do you know about anything where they are treated more visually or do you perhaps want to try that yourself...?
Greetings! Kirsten
Re: I just want to say...
My experience with wreath products has been much like Kirsten, only, my problem is that my pictures are different than my advisor's!
...but yeah, pictures would be great, at least for finite wreaths. I would suggest giving many examples. For instance, as automorphisms of a graph they are easy to see because our brains see repeated patterns in a graphs without a problem. Even if an example teaches you the wrong intuition about wreaths, I'd say it is better than none.
...will you dare touch twisted wreaths? O'Nan-Scott's classification of primitive permutation groups might be a nice followup article.
Re: I just want to say...
I would like to see wreath product explained in terms of matrices. Thank you. -Wendy Wang