Young’s theorem
The following result is due to William Henry Young.
Theorem 1
Observe the analogy with the similar result with convolution replaced by ordinary (pointwise) product, where the requirement is —i.e., —instead of (1). The cases
-
1.
,
-
2.
, ,
are the most widely known; for these we provide a proof, supposing . We shall use the following facts:
-
•
If are measurable, then is measurable.
-
•
For any , if , then belongs to as well, and its -norm is the same as ’s.
-
•
For any , if , then belongs to as well, and its -norm is the same as ’s.
Proof of case 1.
Suppose , with . Then
This holds for all , therefore as well.
Proof of case 2.
First, suppose . We may suppose and are Borel measurable: if they are not, we replace them with Borel measurable functions and which are equal to and , respectively, outside of a set of Lebesgue measure zero; apply the theorem to , , and ; and deduce the theorem for , , and . By Tonelli’s theorem,
thus the function belongs to . By Fubini’s theorem, the function belongs to for almost all , and belongs to ; plus,
Suppose now ; choose so that . By the argument above, belongs to for almost all : for those , put Then and with , so and but , so point 1 of the theorem is proved. By Hölder’s inequality,
but we know that , so and point 2 is also proved. Finally,
but means and thus , so that point 3 is also proved.
References
- 1 G. Gilardi. Analisi tre. McGraw-Hill 1994.
- 2 W. Rudin. Real and complex analysis. McGraw-Hill 1987.
- 3 W. H. Young. On the multiplication of successions of Fourier constants. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Series A 87 (1912) 331–339.
Title | Young’s theorem |
---|---|
Canonical name | YoungsTheorem |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 18:17:44 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 18:17:44 |
Owner | Ziosilvio (18733) |
Last modified by | Ziosilvio (18733) |
Numerical id | 15 |
Author | Ziosilvio (18733) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 44A35 |