Abel’s lemma
Theorem 1 Let and be sequences of real (or complex) numbers with . For , let be the partial sum . Then
In the trivial case, when , then sum on the right hand side should be interpreted as identically zero. In other words, if the upper limit is below the lower limit, there is no summation.
An inductive proof can be found here (http://planetmath.org/ProofOfAbelsLemmaByInduction). The result can be found in [1] (Exercise 3.3.5).
If the sequences are indexed from to , we have the following variant:
Corollary Let and be sequences of real (or complex) numbers with . For , let be the partial sum . Then
Proof. By defining , we can apply Theorem 1 to the sequences and .
References
- 1 R.B. Guenther, L.W. Lee, Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics and Integral Equations, Dover Publications, 1988.
Title | Abel’s lemma |
---|---|
Canonical name | AbelsLemma |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:19:49 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:19:49 |
Owner | mathcam (2727) |
Last modified by | mathcam (2727) |
Numerical id | 14 |
Author | mathcam (2727) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 40A05 |
Synonym | summation by parts |
Synonym | Abel’s partial summation |
Synonym | Abel’s identity |
Synonym | Abel’s transformation |
Related topic | PartialSummation |