Bertrand’s conjecture, proof of
This is a version of Erdős’s proof as it appears in Hardy and Wright.
We begin with the following lemma.
Lemma.
Let be a positive integer and be a prime. The highest power of dividing is , where is the floor of .
Proof.
Let divide with as large as possible. Every th term of the sequence![]()
is divisible by , so contributes a factor to . There are such factors. Every th term contributes an extra factor above that, providing new factors. In general, the th terms contribute extra factors to . So the highest power of dividing is .
∎
We now prove the theorem![]()
.
Bertrand’s conjecture.
Let be a minimal counterexample to the claim. Thus there is no prime such that .
In the sequence of primes
each succeeding term is smaller than the double of its predecessor. This shows that .
The binomial expansion (http://planetmath.org/BinomialTheorem) of has terms and has largest term . Hence
For a prime define to be the highest power of dividing . To compute , we apply the lemma to and . We get that
The terms of the sum are all 0 or 1 and vanish when , so , that is, .
Now . By the inequality![]()
just proved, primes larger than do not contribute to this product
, and by assumption
there are no primes between and . So
For , and so for we can apply the previous formula![]()
for and find that it is zero. So for all , the contribution of the primes larger than is zero.
If , all the terms for higher powers of vanish and .
Since is at most 1, an upper bound![]()
for the
contribution for the primes between and is the product of all primes smaller than . This product is
, where is the Chebyshev function
![]()
There are at most primes smaller than and by the inequality their product is less than . Combining this information, we get the inequality
Taking logarithms and applying the upper bound of for (http://planetmath.org/UpperBoundOnVarthetan), we obtain the inequality , which is false for sufficiently large , say . This shows that .
Since the conditions and are incompatible, there are no counterexamples![]()
to the claim.
∎
References
- 1 G.H. Hardy, E.M. Wright, An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Oxford University Press, 1938.
| Title | Bertrand’s conjecture, proof of |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | BertrandsConjectureProofOf |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:18:55 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:18:55 |
| Owner | CWoo (3771) |
| Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
| Numerical id | 15 |
| Author | CWoo (3771) |
| Entry type | Proof |
| Classification | msc 11N05 |