You are here
Home ›Euler-Fermat theorem
Primary tabs
Euler-Fermat theorem
If such that , then , where is the Euler totient function.
Keywords:
number theory
Related:
FermatsLittleTheorem, FermatsTheoremProof
Synonym:
Euler's theorem
Type of Math Object:
Theorem
Major Section:
Reference
Mathematics Subject Classification
20A05 Axiomatics and elementary properties20-01 Instructional exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.)
11-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
82-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
83-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
81-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
55-00 General reference works (handbooks, dictionaries, bibliographies, etc.)
18F99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 18Fxx
58Z05 Applications to physics
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
Jun 15
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe



Comments
Euler-Fermat theorem
I am not very familiar with this area but your proof appears to assume n>0 (and a>0?) whereas the theorem statement does not?
Can you clarify please?
Regards,
Clive Counsell
Re: Euler-Fermat theorem
The statement of the theorem should include n>0, but a>0 is not necessary either for the statement or the proof.
Cam