## You are here

Homeexistence of power series

## Primary tabs

# existence of power series

In this entry we shall demonstrate the logical equivalence of the holomorphic and analytic concepts. As is the case with so many basic results in complex analysis, the proof of these facts hinges on the Cauchy integral theorem, and the Cauchy integral formula.

# Holomorphic implies analytic.

###### Theorem 1.

Let $U\subset\mathbb{C}$ be an open domain that contains the origin, and let $f:U\rightarrow\mathbb{C},$ be a function such that the complex derivative

$f^{{\prime}}(z)=\lim_{{\zeta\rightarrow 0}}\frac{f(z+\zeta)-f(z)}{\zeta}$ |

exists for all $z\in U$. Then, there exists a power series representation

$f(z)=\sum_{{k=0}}^{\infty}a_{k}z^{k},\quad\|z\|<R,\quad a_{k}\in\mathbb{C}$ |

for a sufficiently small radius of convergence $R>0$.

Note: it is just as easy to show the existence of a power series representation around every basepoint in $z_{0}\in U$; one need only consider the holomorphic function $f(z-z_{0})$.

*Proof.* Choose an $R>0$ sufficiently small so that the
disk $\|z\|\leq R$ is contained in $U$.
By the Cauchy integral formula we have
that

$f(z)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{{\|\zeta\|=R}}\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta-z}\,d\zeta,% \quad\|z\|<R,$ |

where, as usual, the integration contour is oriented counterclockwise. For every $\zeta$ of modulus $R$, we can expand the integrand as a geometric power series in $z$, namely

$\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta-z}=\frac{f(\zeta)/\zeta}{1-z/\zeta}=\sum_{{k=0}}^{\infty% }\,\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta^{{k+1}}}\,z^{k},\quad\|z\|<R.$ |

The circle of radius $R$ is a compact set; hence $f(\zeta)$ is bounded on it; and hence, the power series above converges uniformly with respect to $\zeta$. Consequently, the order of the infinite summation and the integration operations can be interchanged. Hence,

$f(z)=\sum_{{k=0}}^{\infty}a_{k}z^{k},\quad\|z\|<R,$ |

where

$a_{k}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{{\|\zeta\|=R}}\frac{f(\zeta)}{\zeta^{{k+1}}},$ |

as desired. QED

# Analytic implies holomorphic.

###### Theorem 2.

Let

$f(z)=\sum_{{n=0}}^{\infty}a_{n}z^{n},\quad a_{n}\in\mathbb{C},\quad\|z\|<\epsilon$ |

be a power series, converging in $D=D_{\epsilon}(0)$, the open disk of radius $\epsilon>0$ about the origin. Then the complex derivative

$f^{{\prime}}(z)=\lim_{{\zeta\rightarrow 0}}\frac{f(z+\zeta)-f(z)}{\zeta}$ |

exists for all $z\in D$, i.e. the function $f:D\rightarrow\mathbb{C}$ is holomorphic.

Note: this theorem generalizes immediately to shifted power series in $z-z_{0},\;z_{0}\in\mathbb{C}$.

*Proof.* For every $z_{0}\in D$, the function $f(z)$ can be recast
as a power series centered at $z_{0}$. Hence, without loss of
generality it suffices to prove the theorem for $z=0$. The power
series

$\sum_{{n=0}}^{\infty}a_{{n+1}}\zeta^{n},\quad\zeta\in D$ |

converges, and equals $(f(\zeta)-f(0))/\zeta$ for $\zeta\neq 0$. Consequently, the complex derivative $f^{{\prime}}(0)$ exists; indeed it is equal to $a_{1}$. QED

## Mathematics Subject Classification

30B10*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907

Jun 24

new question: A good question by Ron Castillo

Jun 23

new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo

Jun 19

new question: Banach lattice valued Bochner integrals by math ias