invariant forms on representations of compact groups


Let G be a real Lie group. TFAE:

  1. 1.

    Every real representation of G has an invariantMathworldPlanetmath positive definite form, and G has at least one faithful representationMathworldPlanetmath.

  2. 2.

    One faithful representation of G has an invariant positive definite form.

  3. 3.

    G is compactPlanetmathPlanetmath.

Also, any group satisfying these criteria is reductive, and its Lie algebraMathworldPlanetmath is the direct sumMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath of simple algebras and an abelianMathworldPlanetmath algebraPlanetmathPlanetmath (such an algebra is often called reductive).

Proof.

(1)(2): Obvious.

(2)(3): Let Ω be the invariant form on a faithful representation V. Let then representationPlanetmathPlanetmath gives an embeddingMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath ρ:GSO(V,Ω), the group of automorphismsPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath of V preserving Ω. Thus, G is homeomorphic to a closed subgroup of SO(V,Ω). Since this group is compact, G must be compact as well.

(Proof that SO(V,Ω) is compact: By inductionMathworldPlanetmath on dimV. Let vV be an arbitrary vector. Then there is a map, evaluation on v, from SO(V,Ω)SdimV-1V (this is topologically a sphere, since (V,ω) is isometric to dimV with the standard norm). This is a a fiber bundle, and the fiber over any point is a copy of SO(v,Ω), which is compact by the inductive hypothesis. Any fiber bundle over a compact base with compact fiber has compact total space. Thus SO(V,Ω) is compact).

(3)(1): Let V be an arbitrary representation of G. Choose an arbitrary positive definite form Ω on V. Then define

Ω~(v,w)=GΩ(gv,gw)𝑑g,

where dg is Haar measure (normalized so that G𝑑g=1). Since K is compact, this gives a well defined form. It is obviously bilinear, bSO(V,Ω)y the linearity of integration, and positive definite since

Ω~(gv,gv)=GΩ(gv,gv)𝑑ginfgGΩ(gv,gv)>0.

Furthermore, Ω~ is invariant, since

Ω~(hv,hw)=GΩ(ghv,ghw)𝑑g=GΩ(ghv,ghw)d(gh)=Ω~(v,w).

For representation ρ:TGL(V) of the maximal torus TK, there exists a representation ρ of K, with ρ a T-subrepresentation of ρ. Also, since every conjugacy classMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath of K intersects any maximal torus, a representation of K is faithful if and only if it restricts to a faithful representation of T. Since any torus has a faithful representation, K must have one as well.

Given that these criteria hold, let V be a representation of G, Ω is positive definite real form, and W a subrepresentation. Now consider

W={vV|Ω(v,w)=0wW}.

By the positive definiteness of Ω, V=WW. By induction, V is completely reducible.

Applying this to the adjoint representationMathworldPlanetmath of G on 𝔤, its Lie algebra, we find that 𝔤 in the direct sum of simple algebras 𝔤1,,𝔤n, in the sense that 𝔤i has no proper nontrivial ideals, meaning that 𝔤i is simple in the usual sense or it is abelian. ∎

Title invariant forms on representations of compact groups
Canonical name InvariantFormsOnRepresentationsOfCompactGroups
Date of creation 2013-03-22 13:23:40
Last modified on 2013-03-22 13:23:40
Owner bwebste (988)
Last modified by bwebste (988)
Numerical id 11
Author bwebste (988)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 54-00