multiplication of series


Theorem (Franz Mertens). If the series ∑k=1∞ak and ∑k=1∞bk with real or complex converge and have the sums (http://planetmath.org/SumOfSeries) A and B, respectively, and at least one of them converges absolutely, then also the series

a1⁢b1+(a1⁢b2+a2⁢b1)+(a1⁢b3+a2⁢b2+a3⁢b1)+⋯ (1)

is convergentMathworldPlanetmath and its is equal to A⁢B.

Proof.  Denote the partial sums of the series  An:=a1+a2+⋯+an,  Bn:=b1+b2+⋯+bn  and  sn:=a1⁢b1+(a1⁢b2+a2⁢b1)+(a1⁢b3+a2⁢b2+a3⁢b1)+⋯+(a1⁢bn+a2⁢bn-1+⋯+an⁢b1)  for each n.  Then we have  limn→∞⁡An=A  and  limn→∞⁡Bn=B.  Suppose that e.g. the series ∑an converges absolutely and that at least one an is distinct from zero; so the   ∑n=1∞|an| is a real positive number M.  Let ε be an arbitrary positive number.

Now we can write the identities

A⁢B=(A-An)⁢B+a1⁢B+a2⁢B+⋯+an⁢B,

sn=a1⁢(b1+b2+⋯+bn)+a2⁢(b1+b2+⋯+bn-1)+⋯+an⁢b1=a1⁢Bn+a2⁢Bn-1+⋯+an⁢B1,

A⁢B-sn=(A-An)⁢B+a1⁢(B-Bn)+a2⁢(B-Bn-1)+⋯+an⁢(B-B1)
=(A-An)⁢B+[a1⁢(B-Bn)+a2⁢(B-Bn-1)+⋯+ak⁢(B-Bn-k+1)]+ak+1⁢(B-Bn-k)+⋯+an⁢(B-B1).

There is a positive number n1⁢(ε) such that  |A-An|<ε3⁢(|B|+1)  when  n>n1⁢(ε).  Then

|(A-An)⁢B|=|A-An|⋅|B|<ε3⁢(|B|+1)⁢(|B|+1)=ε3. (2)

The convergence of ∑bn implies that there is a number n2⁢(ε) such that  |B-Bn|<ε3⁢M  when  n>n2⁢(ε).  Thus we have

|[…]|≤|a1|⋅|B-Bn|+⋯+|ak|⋅|B-Bn-k+1|<(|a1|+⋯+|ak|)⁢ε3⁢M≤M⋅ε3⁢M=ε3 (3)

if  n-k+1>n2⁢(ε).  Because  limn→∞⁡Bn=B,  the numbers |Bn| are boundedPlanetmathPlanetmath, i.e. there is a positive number K such that for each j we have  |Bj|<K  and consequently  |B|≤K.  It follows that  |B-Bj|≤|B|+|Bj|<K+K=2⁢K  for every j.  We apply Cauchy criterion for convergence to the series ∑n=1∞|an| getting a number n3⁢(ε) such that for each m, one has the inequality  |ak+1|+⋯+|am|<ε6⁢K  if  k>n3⁢(ε).  Accordingly we obtain the estimation

|ak+1⁢(B-Bn-k)+⋯+an⁢(B-B1)|≤|ak+1|⁢|B-Bn-k|+⋯+|an|⁢|B-B1|<2⁢K⋅ε6⁢K=ε3 (4)

which is valid when  k>n3⁢(ε).

If we choose  n>max{n1(ε},n2(ε)+n3(ε)}  and k such that  n≥k>n3⁢(ε)+1,  then the inequalities (2), (3) and (4) are satisfied, ensuring that

|A⁢B-sn|<ε3+ε3+ε3=ε.

This means that the assertion of the theorem has been proved.

Remark.  The mere convergence of both series does not suffice for convergence of (1).  This is seen in the following example by Cauchy where both series are

1-12+13-+⋯

They converge by virtue of Leibniz test, but not absolutely (see the p-test (http://planetmath.org/PTest)).  In their product series

1-(12+12)+(13+1212+13)-+⋯

the absolute valueMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath of the nth is  1⋅1n+12⁢1n-1+⋯+1n⋅1,  having n summands which all are greater than 2n+1 (this is seen when one looks at the half circle  y=x⁢n+1-x  or  (x-n+12)2+y2=(n+12)2,  which shows that  y≤n+12  and thus  1y≥2n+1).  Because  limn→∞⁡n⋅2n+1=2≠0, the product series does not satisfy the necessary condition of convergence (http://planetmath.org/ThenA_kto0IfSum_k1inftyA_kConverges) and therefore the series diverges.

References

  • 1 Ernst Lindelöf: Johdatus funktioteoriaan.  Mercatorin Kirjapaino Osakeyhtiö. Helsinki (1936).
Title multiplication of series
Canonical name MultiplicationOfSeries
Date of creation 2014-10-31 20:23:29
Last modified on 2014-10-31 20:23:29
Owner pahio (2872)
Last modified by pahio (2872)
Numerical id 21
Author pahio (2872)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 40A05
Synonym Cauchy multiplication rule
Related topic ManipulatingConvergentSeries
Related topic AlternatingHarmonicSeries
Related topic ErnstLindelof