proof of argument principle
Since f is meromorphic, f′ is meromorphic, and hence f′/f is meromorphic. The singularities of f′/f can only occur at the zeros and the poles of f.
I claim that all singularities of f′/f are simple poles. Furthermore, if f has a zero at some point p, then the residue of the pole at p is positive and equals the multiplicity of the zero of f at p. If f has a pole at some point p, then the residue of the pole at p is negative and equals minus the multiplicity of the pole of f at p.
To prove these assertions, write f(x)=(x-p)ng(x) with g(p)≠0. Then
f′(x)f(x)=nx-p+g′(x)g(x) |
Since g(p)≠0, the only singularity of f′/f at p comes from the first summand. Since n is either the order of the zero of f at p if f has a zero at p or minus the order of the pole of f at p if f has a pole at p, the assertion is proven.
By the Cauchy residue theorem, the integral
12πi∫Cf′(z)f(z)𝑑z |
equals the sum of the residues of f′/f. Combining this fact with the characterization of the poles of f′/f and their residues given above, one deduces that this integral equals the number of zeros of f minus the number of poles of f, counted with multiplicity.
Title | proof of argument principle |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfArgumentPrinciple |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 14:34:32 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 14:34:32 |
Owner | rspuzio (6075) |
Last modified by | rspuzio (6075) |
Numerical id | 11 |
Author | rspuzio (6075) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 30E20 |
Synonym | Cauchy’s argument principle |