proof of ◇ is equivalent to ♣ and continuum hypothesis


The proof that ◇S implies both ♣S and that for every λ<κ, 2λ≤κ are given in the entries for ◇S and ♣S.

Let A=⟨Aα⟩α∈S be a sequence which satisfies ♣S.

Since there are only κ boundedPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath subsets of κ, there is a surjective function f:κ→Bounded⁡(κ)×κ where Bounded⁡(κ) is the bounded subsets of κ. Define a sequence B=⟨Bα⟩α<κ by Bα=f⁢(α) if s⁢u⁢p⁢(Bα)<α and ∅ otherwise. Since the set of (Bα,λ)∈Bounded⁡(κ)×κ such that Bα=T is unboundedPlanetmathPlanetmath for any bounded subset T, it follow that every bounded subset of κ occurs κ times in B.

We can define a new sequence, D=⟨Dα⟩α∈S such that x∈Dα↔x∈Bβ for some β∈Aα. We can show that D satisfies ◇S.

First, for any α, x∈Dα means that x∈Bβ for some β∈Aα, and since Bβ⊆β∈Aα⊆α, we have Dα⊆α.

Next take any T⊆κ. We consider two cases:

T is bounded

The set of α such that T=Bα forms an unbounded sequence T′, so there is a stationary S′⊆S such that α∈S′↔Aα⊂T′. For each such α, x∈Dα↔x∈Bi for some i∈Aα⊂T′. But each such Bi is equal to T, so Dα=T.

T is unbounded

We define a function j:κ→κ as follows:

  • •

    j⁢(0)=0

  • •

    To find j⁢(α), take X∩{j⁢(β)∣β<α}. This is a bounded subset of κ, so is equal to an unbounded series of elements of B. Take j⁢(α)=γ, where γ is the least number greater than any element of {α}∪{j⁢(β)∣β<α} such that Bγ=X∩{j⁢(β)∣β<α}.

Let T′=range⁡(j). This is obviously unbounded, and so there is a stationary S′⊆S such that α∈S′↔Aα⊆T′.

Next, consider C, the set of ordinalsMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath less than κ closed under j. Clearly it is unbounded, since if λ<κ then j⁢(λ) includes j⁢(α) for α<λ, and so inductionMathworldPlanetmath gives an ordinal greater than λ closed under j (essentially the result of applying j an infiniteMathworldPlanetmath number of times). Also, C is closed: take any c⊆C and suppose sup⁡(c∩α)=α. Then for any β<α, there is some γ∈c such that β<γ<α and therefore j⁢(β)<γ. So α is closed under j, and therefore contained in C.

Since C is a club, C′=C∩S′ is stationary. Suppose α∈C′. Then x∈Dα↔x∈Bβ where β∈Aα. Since α∈S′, β∈range⁡(j), and therefore Bβ⊆T. Next take any x∈T∩α. Since α∈C, it is closed under j, hence there is some γ∈α such that j⁢(x)∈γ. Since sup⁡(Aα)=α, there is some η∈Aα such that γ<η, so j⁢(x)∈η. Since η∈Aα, Bη⊆Dα, and since η∈range⁡(j), j⁢(δ)∈Bη for any δ<j-1⁢(η), and in particular x∈Bη. Since we showed above that Dα⊆α, we have Dα=T∩α for any α∈C′.

Title proof of ◇ is equivalentMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath to ♣ and continuum hypothesisMathworldPlanetmath
Canonical name ProofOfDiamondIsEquivalentToclubsuitAndContinuumHypothesis
Date of creation 2013-03-22 12:53:57
Last modified on 2013-03-22 12:53:57
Owner Henry (455)
Last modified by Henry (455)
Numerical id 6
Author Henry (455)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 03E45
Synonym proof that diamond is equivalent to club and continuum hypothesis
Related topic DiamondMathworldPlanetmath
Related topic Clubsuit