Processing math: 0%

proof of equivalence of formulas for exp


We present an elementary proof that:

k=0zkk!=lim

There are of course other proofs, but this one has the advantage that it carries verbatim for the matrix exponentialMathworldPlanetmath and the operator exponentialPlanetmathPlanetmath.

At the outset, we observe that k=0zk/k! converges by the ratio testMathworldPlanetmath. For definiteness, the notation ez below will refer to exactly this series.

Proof.

We expand the right-hand in the straightforward manner:

(1+zn)n =k=0n(nk)(zn)k
=k=0nn(n-1)(n-k+1)nkzkk!=k=0nπ(k,n)zkk!,

where π(k,n) denotes the coefficient

1(1-1n)(1-2n)(1-k-1n).

Let |z|M. Given ϵ>0, there is a N such that whenever nN, then k=n+1Mk/k!<ϵ/2, since the sum is the tail of the convergent seriesMathworldPlanetmath eM.

Since limnπ(k,n)=1 for k, there is also a N, with NN, so that whenever nN and 0kN, then |π(k,n)-1|<ϵ/(2eM). (Note that k is chosen only from a finite set.)

Now, when nN, we have

|k=0nπ(k,n)zkk!-k=0zkk!| =|k=0n(π(k,n)-1)zkk!-k=n+1zkk!|
k=0n|π(k,n)-1|Mkk!+k=n+1Mkk!
=k=0N|π(k,n)-1|Mkk!+k=N+1n|π(k,n)-1|Mkk!+k=n+1Mkk!
<ϵ2eMk=0NMkk!+k=N+1nMkk!+k=n+1Mkk!
(In the middle sum, we use the bound |π(k,n)-1|=1-π(k,n)1 for all k and n.)
<ϵ2eMeM+ϵ2=ϵ.

In fact, we have proved uniform convergenceMathworldPlanetmath of limn(1+zn)n over |z|M. Exploiting this fact we can also show:

(1+zn+o(1n))n=(1+z+o(1)n)nk=0zkk!(pointwise, as n)
Proof.

|z|<M. Given ϵ>0, for large enough n, we have

|(1+wn)n-ew|<ϵ/2uniformly for all |w|M.

Since o(1)0, for large enough n we can set w=z+o(1) above. Since the exponential is continuousMathworldPlanetmath11follows from uniform convergence on bounded subsets of either expression for ez, for large enough n we also have |ez+o(1)-ez|<ϵ/2. Thus

|(1+z+o(1)n)n-ez||(1+z+o(1)n)n-ez+o(1)|+|ez+o(1)-ez|<ϵ.
Title proof of equivalence of formulas for exp
Canonical name ProofOfEquivalenceOfFormulasForExp
Date of creation 2013-03-22 15:22:52
Last modified on 2013-03-22 15:22:52
Owner stevecheng (10074)
Last modified by stevecheng (10074)
Numerical id 11
Author stevecheng (10074)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 30A99
Related topic ComplexExponentialFunction
Related topic ExponentialFunction
Related topic MatrixExponential