proof of Euler’s criterion
(All congruences are modulo for the proof; omitted for clarity.)
Let
Then by Fermat’s Little Theorem. Thus:
Now consider the two possibilities:
-
•
If is a quadratic residue then by definition, for some . Hence:
-
•
It remains to show that if is a quadratic non-residue. We can proceed in two ways:
- Proof (a)
-
Partition the set into pairs such that. Then and must always be distinct since is a non-residue. Hence, the product of the union of the partitions is:
and the result follows by Wilson’s Theorem.
- Proof (b)
-
The equation:
has at most roots. But we already know of distinct roots of the above equation, these being the quadratic residues modulo . So can’t be a root, yet . Thus we must have:
QED.
Title | proof of Euler’s criterion |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfEulersCriterion |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 12:41:53 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 12:41:53 |
Owner | Koro (127) |
Last modified by | Koro (127) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | Koro (127) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 11A15 |