You are here
Home ›proof of l'H\^opital's rule for $\infty/\infty$ form
Primary tabs
proof of l’Hôpital’s rule for form
This is the proof of L’Hôpital’s Rule in the case of the indeterminate form . Compared to the proof for the case, more complicated estimates are needed.
Assume that
where and are real numbers. The case when or is infinite only involves slight modifications to the arguments below.
Given . there is a such that
whenever .
Let and be points such that or . (That is, both and are within distance of , but is always closer.) By Cauchy’s mean value theorem, there exists some in between and (and hence ) such that
We can assume the values , , , are all non-zero when is close enough to , say, when for some . (So there is no division by zero in our equations.) This is because and were assumed to approach , so when is close enough to , they will exceed the fixed values , , and .
We write
Note that
but is not guaranteed to approach as approaches , so we cannot just take the limit directly. However: there exists so that
whenever . Then
for .
This proves
References
- 1 Michael Spivak, Calculus, 3rd ed. Publish or Perish, 1994.
Mathematics Subject Classification
26A06 One-variable calculus- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


