proof of Martingale criterion
since .
Now assume (the case being analogous).
1) We have .
We proceed by (backward) induction. For the statement holds.
:
We have:
Where the first to second line is the submartingale property and the last line follows by induction hypothesis.
Using Fatou we get:
2) We have .
We have a.s., . With Fatou we get:
With 1) follows.
3)
is a martingale, because a.s. and:
Thus by bounded convergence theorem. Hence must be martingale and we are done. ∎
Title | proof of Martingale criterion |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfMartingaleCriterion |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 18:34:51 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 18:34:51 |
Owner | karstenb (16623) |
Last modified by | karstenb (16623) |
Numerical id | 5 |
Author | karstenb (16623) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 60G07 |