## You are here

Homeproof of Menelaus' theorem

## Primary tabs

# proof of Menelaus’ theorem

First we note that there are two different cases: Either the line connecting $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ intersects two sides of the triangle or none of them. So in the first case that it intersects two of the triangle’s sides we get the following picture:

From this we follow ($h_{1}$, $h_{2}$ and $h_{3}$ being undircted):

$\displaystyle\frac{AZ}{ZB}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle-\frac{h_{1}}{h_{2}}$ | ||

$\displaystyle\frac{BY}{YC}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle\frac{h_{2}}{h_{3}}$ | ||

$\displaystyle\frac{CX}{XA}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle\frac{h_{3}}{h_{1}}.$ |

Mulitplying all this we get:

$\frac{AZ}{ZB}\cdot\frac{BY}{YC}\cdot\frac{CX}{XA}=-\frac{h_{1}h_{2}h_{3}}{h_{2% }h_{3}h_{1}}=-1.$ |

The second case is that the line connecting $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ does not intersect any of the triangle’s sides:

In this case we get:

$\displaystyle\frac{AZ}{ZB}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle-\frac{h_{1}}{h_{2}}$ | ||

$\displaystyle\frac{BY}{YC}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle-\frac{h_{2}}{h_{3}}$ | ||

$\displaystyle\frac{CX}{XA}$ | $\displaystyle=$ | $\displaystyle-\frac{h_{3}}{h_{1}}.$ |

So multiplication again yields Menelaus’ theorem.

Major Section:

Reference

Type of Math Object:

Proof

Parent:

## Mathematics Subject Classification

51A05*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

8:13 pm

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag

## Info

## Versions

(v4) by mathwizard 2013-03-22