proof that a finite collection of sets will not suffice
Suppose that you cut into .
Displacing the parts is simply translating them; you can suppose
that you leave in place and translate![]()
all the others to the
right. Let be the smallest translation
![]()
length : if after
translation the union contains , necessarily . A contradiction
![]()
ensues.
| Title | proof that a finite collection |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | ProofThatAFiniteCollectionOfSetsWillNotSuffice |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 14:38:46 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 14:38:46 |
| Owner | rspuzio (6075) |
| Last modified by | rspuzio (6075) |
| Numerical id | 4 |
| Author | rspuzio (6075) |
| Entry type | Proof |
| Classification | msc 28E99 |