proof that n2-n+41 is prime for 0≤n≤40
We show that for 0≤n≤40, n2-n+41 is prime. Of course, this can easily be seen by considering the 41 cases, but the proof given here is illustrative of why the statement is true.
Recall that there is only one reduced (http://planetmath.org/IntegralBinaryQuadraticForms) integral binary quadratic form of discriminant -163; that form is x2+xy+41y2. The smallest prime that is represented by that form is 41. For suppose p=x2+xy+41y2 and p<41. Then obviously y=0, so p=x2, which is impossible. Since equivalent
forms represent the same set of integers, it follows that any form of discriminant -163 represents no primes less than 41.
Now suppose n2-n+41 is composite for some n≤40. Then
n2-n+41≤402-40+41<412 |
and thus n2-n+41 has a prime factor q<41. Write n2-n+41=qc; then qx2+(2n-1)xy+cy2 represents q (x=1,y=0); its discriminant is
(2n-1)2-4qc=4n2-4n+1-4(n2-n+41)=-163 |
Since there is only one equivalence class of forms with discriminant -163, qx2+(2n-1)xy+cy2 is equivalent to x2+xy+41y2 and thus represents the same integers. But we know that x2+xy+41y2 cannot represent any prime <41, so cannot represent q. Contradiction
. So n2-n+41 is prime for n≤40.
This proof works equally well for the other cases mentioned in the parent article, since for each of those cases, there is only one reduced form (http://planetmath.org/IntegralBinaryQuadraticForms) of the appropriate discriminant, which is 1-4p.
Title | proof that n2-n+41 is prime for 0≤n≤40 |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofThatN2n41IsPrimeFor0leqNleq40 |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 16:55:48 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 16:55:48 |
Owner | rm50 (10146) |
Last modified by | rm50 (10146) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | rm50 (10146) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 11A41 |