relation between almost surely absolutely bounded random variables and their absolute moments


Let {Ω,E,P} a probability spaceMathworldPlanetmath and let X be a random variableMathworldPlanetmath; then, the following are equivalentMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath:

1) Pr{|X|M}=1  i.e. X is absolutely bounded almost surely;

2) E[|X|k]Mk       k1,kN

Proof.

1) 2)

Let’s define

F={ωΩ:|X(ω)|>M};

Then by hypothesisMathworldPlanetmath

Pr{Ω\F}=1

and

Pr{F}=0.

We have:

E[|X|k] = Ω|X|k𝑑P
= Ω\F|X|k𝑑P+F|X|k𝑑P
= Ω\F|X|k𝑑P
Ω\FMk𝑑P
= MkPr{Ω\F}=Mk.

2) 1)

Let’s define

F = {ωΩ:|X(ω)|>M}
Fn = {ωΩ:|X(ω)|>M+1n} n1.

Then we have obviously FnFn+1 (in fact, if ωFn|X(ω)|>M+1n>M+1n+1ωFn+1) and F=n=1Fn (in fact, let ωF; let N=1|X(ω)|-M; then |X(ω)|>M+1N, that is ωFN); this means that

F=limnFn

in the meaning of sets sequencesMathworldPlanetmath convergence (http://planetmath.org/SequenceOfSetsConvergence).

So the continuity from below property (http://planetmath.org/PropertiesForMeasure) of probability can be applied:

Pr{F}=Pr{limnFn}=limnPr{Fn}.

Now, for any k1,

Mk E[|X|k]
= Ω|X(ω)|k𝑑P
= Ω\Fn|X(ω)|k𝑑P+Fn|X(ω)|k𝑑P
Fn|X(ω)|k𝑑P
Fn(M+1n)k𝑑P
= (M+1n)kPr{Fn}.

that is

Pr{Fn}(MM+1n)k for any k1

so that the only acceptable value for Pr{Fn} is

Pr{Fn}=0

whence the thesis. ∎

Acknowledgements: due to helpful discussions with Mathprof.

Title relation between almost surely absolutely bounded random variables and their absolute moments
Canonical name RelationBetweenAlmostSurelyAbsolutelyBoundedRandomVariablesAndTheirAbsoluteMoments
Date of creation 2013-03-22 16:14:33
Last modified on 2013-03-22 16:14:33
Owner Andrea Ambrosio (7332)
Last modified by Andrea Ambrosio (7332)
Numerical id 8
Author Andrea Ambrosio (7332)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 60A10