You are here
Homerelative complement
Primary tabs
relative complement
A complement of an element in a lattice is only defined when the lattice in question is bounded. In general, a lattice is not bounded and there are no complements to speak of. Nevertheless, if the sublattice of a lattice is bounded, we can speak of complements of an element relative to that sublattice.
Let $L$ be a lattice, $a$ an element of $L$, and $I=[b,c]$ an interval in $L$. An element $d\in L$ is said to be a complement of $a$ relative to $I$ if
$a\vee d=c\,\mbox{ and }\,a\wedge d=b.$ 
It is easy to see that $a\leq c$ and $b\leq a$, so $a\in I$. Similarly, $d\in I$.
An element $a\in L$ is said to be relatively complemented if for every interval $I$ in $L$ with $a\in I$, it has a complement relative to $I$. The lattice $L$ itself is called a relatively complemented lattice if every element of $L$ is relatively complemented. Equivalently, $L$ is relatively complemented iff each of its interval is a complemented lattice.
Remarks.

A relatively complemented lattice is complemented if it is bounded. Conversely, a complemented lattice is relatively complemented if it is modular.

The notion of a relative complement of an element in a lattice has nothing to do with that found in set theory: let $U$ be a set and $A,B$ subsets of $U$, the relative complement of $A$ in $B$ is the set theoretic difference $BA$. While the relative difference is necessarily a subset of $B$, $A$ does not have to be a subset of $B$.
Mathematics Subject Classification
06C15 no label found Forums
 Planetary Bugs
 HS/Secondary
 University/Tertiary
 Graduate/Advanced
 Industry/Practice
 Research Topics
 LaTeX help
 Math Comptetitions
 Math History
 Math Humor
 PlanetMath Comments
 PlanetMath System Updates and News
 PlanetMath help
 PlanetMath.ORG
 Strategic Communications Development
 The Math Pub
 Testing messages (ignore)
 Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new correction: Error in proof of Proposition 2 by alex2907
Jun 24
new question: A good question by Ron Castillo
Jun 23
new question: A trascendental number. by Ron Castillo