You are here
Homerelative complement
Primary tabs
relative complement
A complement of an element in a lattice is only defined when the lattice in question is bounded. In general, a lattice is not bounded and there are no complements to speak of. Nevertheless, if the sublattice of a lattice is bounded, we can speak of complements of an element relative to that sublattice.
Let $L$ be a lattice, $a$ an element of $L$, and $I=[b,c]$ an interval in $L$. An element $d\in L$ is said to be a complement of $a$ relative to $I$ if
$a\vee d=c\,\mbox{ and }\,a\wedge d=b.$ 
It is easy to see that $a\leq c$ and $b\leq a$, so $a\in I$. Similarly, $d\in I$.
An element $a\in L$ is said to be relatively complemented if for every interval $I$ in $L$ with $a\in I$, it has a complement relative to $I$. The lattice $L$ itself is called a relatively complemented lattice if every element of $L$ is relatively complemented. Equivalently, $L$ is relatively complemented iff each of its interval is a complemented lattice.
Remarks.

A relatively complemented lattice is complemented if it is bounded. Conversely, a complemented lattice is relatively complemented if it is modular.

The notion of a relative complement of an element in a lattice has nothing to do with that found in set theory: let $U$ be a set and $A,B$ subsets of $U$, the relative complement of $A$ in $B$ is the set theoretic difference $BA$. While the relative difference is necessarily a subset of $B$, $A$ does not have to be a subset of $B$.
Mathematics Subject Classification
06C15 no label found Forums
 Planetary Bugs
 HS/Secondary
 University/Tertiary
 Graduate/Advanced
 Industry/Practice
 Research Topics
 LaTeX help
 Math Comptetitions
 Math History
 Math Humor
 PlanetMath Comments
 PlanetMath System Updates and News
 PlanetMath help
 PlanetMath.ORG
 Strategic Communications Development
 The Math Pub
 Testing messages (ignore)
 Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom
Oct 19
new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie
Oct 13
new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton
Oct 7
new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou
new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey
Oct 2
new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache
Sep 28
new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba
new question: simple question by parag
Sep 26
new question: Latent variable by adam_reith