You are here
Home ›subgroup of topological group is either clopen or has empty interior
Primary tabs
subgroup of topological group is either clopen or has empty interior
Theorem - Every subgroup of a topological group is either clopen or has empty interior.
Proof: Let be a topological group and a subgroup. Suppose the interior of is nonempty, i.e. there is a non-empty open set of such that . Translating around we can see that is open: if then for every the set is open in , is contained in and contains , which implies that is open in .
Let us now see that is closed. Let denote the closure of and let be the set of elements of the form where . Of course, since is a subgroup of , we have that . Also, since is open we know that (see this entry - Proposition 5). Hence , i.e. is closed.
We have proven that a subgroup of a topological group must be clopen or it must have empty interior. Since this two topological properties can never be satisfied simultaneously, we have that every subgroup of a topological group is either clopen or it has empty interior.
Mathematics Subject Classification
22A05 Structure of general topological groups- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


