## You are here

HomeTarski-Seidenberg theorem

## Primary tabs

# Tarski-Seidenberg theorem

###### Theorem (Tarski-Seidenberg).

The set of semialgebraic sets is closed under projection.

That is, if $A\subset{\mathbb{R}}^{n}\times{\mathbb{R}}^{m}$ is a semialgebraic set, and if $\pi$ is the projection onto the first $n$ coordinates, then $\pi(A)$ is also semialgebraic.

Łojasiewicz generalized this theorem further. For this we need a bit of notation.

Let $U\subset{\mathbb{R}}^{n}$. Suppose $\mathcal{A}(U)$ is any ring of real valued functions on $U$. Define $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{A}(U))$ to be the smallest set of subsets of $U$, which contain the sets $\{x\in U\mid f(x)>0\}$ for all $f\in\mathcal{A}(U)$, and is closed under finite union, finite intersection and complement. Let $\mathcal{A}(U)[t]$ denote the ring of polynomials in $t\in{\mathbb{R}}^{m}$ with coefficients in $\mathcal{A}(U)$.

###### Theorem (Tarski-Seidenberg-Łojasiewicz).

Suppose that $V\subset U\times{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\subset{\mathbb{R}}^{{n+m}}$, is such that $V\in\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{A}(U)[t])$. Then the projection of $V$ onto the first $n$ variables is in $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{A}(U))$.

# References

- 1
Edward Bierstone and Pierre D. Milman,
*Semianalytic and subanalytic sets*, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1988), no. 67, 5–42. MR 89k:32011

## Mathematics Subject Classification

14P15*no label found*14P10

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag