You are here
Home ›Taylor's formula in Banach spaces
Primary tabs
Taylor’s formula in Banach spaces
Let be an open subset of a real Banach space . If is differentiable times on , it may be expanded by Taylor’s formula:
| (1) |
with the following expressions for the remainder term :
| Cauchy form of remainder | ||||
| Lagrange form of remainder | ||||
| integral form of remainder |
Here and must be points of such that the line segment between and lie inside , is , and the points and lie on the same line segment, strictly between and .
The th Fréchet derivative of at is being denoted by , to be viewed as a multilinear map . The notation means to evaluate a multilinear map at .
1 Remainders for vector-valued functions
If is a Banach space, we may also consider Taylor expansions for . Formula (4) takes the same form, but the Cauchy and Lagrange forms of the remainder will not be exact; they will only be bounds on . That is, for ,
| Cauchy form of remainder | ||||
| Lagrange form of remainder |
It is not hard to find counterexamples if we attempt to remove the norm signs or change the inequality to equality in the above formulas.
However, the integral form of the remainder continues to hold for , although strictly speaking it only applies if the integrand is integrable. The integral form is also applicable when and are complex Banach spaces.
Mean Value Theorem
The Mean Value Theorem can be obtained as the special case with the Lagrange form of the remainder: for differentiable,
| (2) |
If , then the norm signs may be removed from (2), and the inequality replaced by equality.
Formula (2) also holds under the much weaker hypothesis that only has a directional derivative along the line segment from to .
Weaker bounds for the remainder
If is only differentiable times at , then we cannot quantify the remainder by the th derivative, but it is still true that
| (3) |
Finite-dimensional case
If we collect the equal mixed partials (assuming that they are continuous) then
where is a multi-index of components, and each component indicates how many times the derivative with respect to the th coordinate should be taken, and the exponent that the th coordinate of should be raised to in the monomial . The multi-index runs through all combinations such that in the sum. The notation means .
All this is more easily assimilated if we remember that is supposed to be a polynomial of degree . Also is just the multinomial coefficient.
Taylor series
If , then we may write
| (4) |
as a convergent infinite series. Elegant as such an expansion is, it is not seen very often, for the reason that higher order Fréchet derivatives, especially in infinite-dimensional spaces, are often difficult to calculate.
But a notable exception occurs if a function is defined by a convergent “power series”
| (5) |
where is a family of continuous symmetric multilinear functions . In this case, the series (5) is the Taylor series for at .
References
- 1 Arthur Wouk. A course of applied functional analysis. Wiley-Interscience, 1979.
- 2 Eberhard Zeidler. Applied functional analysis: main principles and their applications. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
- 3 Michael Spivak. Calculus, third edition. Publish or Perish, 1994.
Mathematics Subject Classification
46T20 Continuous and differentiable maps26B12 Calculus of vector functions
41A58 Series expansions (e.g. Taylor, Lidstone series, but not Fourier series)
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


