You are here
Home ›topological conjugation
Primary tabs
topological conjugation
Let and be topological spaces, and let and be continuous functions. We say that is topologically semiconjugate to , if there exists a continuous surjection such that . If is a homeomorphism, then we say that and are topologically conjugate, and we call a topological conjugation between and .
Similarly, a flow on is topologically semiconjugate to a flow on if there is a continuous surjection such that for each , . If is a homeomorphism then and are topologically conjugate.
0.1 Remarks
Topological conjugation defines an equivalence relation in the space of all continuous surjections of a topological space to itself, by declaring and to be related if they are topologically conjugate. This equivalence relation is very useful in the theory of dynamical systems, since each class contains all functions which share the same dynamics from the topological viewpoint. In fact, orbits of are mapped to homeomorphic orbits of through the conjugation. Writing makes this fact evident: . Speaking informally, topological conjugation is a “change of coordinates” in the topological sense.
However, the analogous definition for flows is somewhat restrictive. In fact, we are requiring the maps and to be topologically conjugate for each , which is requiring more than simply that orbits of be mapped to orbits of homeomorphically. This motivates the definition of topological equivalence, which also partitions the set of all flows in into classes of flows sharing the same dynamics, again from the topological viewpoint.
We say that and are topologically equivalent, if there is an homeomorphism , mapping orbits of to orbits of homeomorphically, and preserving orientation of the orbits. This means that:
1. for each ;
2. for each , there is such that, if , and if is such that , then .
Mathematics Subject Classification
37C15 Topological and differentiable equivalence, conjugacy, invariants, moduli, classification37B99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 37Bxx
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


