proof of Borsuk-Ulam theorem


Proof of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem: I’m going to prove a stronger statement than the one given in the statement of the Borsak-Ulam theorem here, which is:

Every odd (that is, antipode-preserving) map f:Sn→Sn has odd degree.

Proof: We go by inductionMathworldPlanetmath on n. Consider the pair (Sn,A) where A is the equatorial sphere. f defines a map

f~:ℝ⁢Pn→ℝ⁢Pn

. By cellular approximation, this may be assumed to take the hyperplane at infinity (the n-1-cell of the standard cell structureMathworldPlanetmath on ℝ⁢Pn) to itself. Since whether a map lifts to a covering depends only on its homotopy class, f is homotopicMathworldPlanetmath to an odd map taking A to itself. We may assume that f is such a map.

The map f gives us a morphismMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath of the long exact sequences:

Hn⁢(A;ℤ2)→iHn⁢(Sn;ℤ2)→jHn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2)→∂Hn-1⁢(A;ℤ2)→iHn-1⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2)f*↓f*↓f*↓f*↓f*↓Hn⁢(A;ℤ2)→iHn⁢(Sn;ℤ2)→jHn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2)→∂Hn-1⁢(A;ℤ2)→iHn-1⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2)

Clearly, the map f|A is odd, so by the induction hypothesis, f|A has odd degree. Note that a map has odd degree if and only if f*:Hn⁢(Sn;ℤ2)→Hn⁢(Sn,ℤ2) is an isomorphismMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath. Thus

f*:Hn-1⁢(A;ℤ2)→Hn-1⁢(A;ℤ2)

is an isomorphism. By the commutativity of the diagram, the map

f*:Hn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2)→Hn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2)

is not trivial. I claim it is an isomorphism. Hn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2) is generated by cycles [R+] and [R-] which are the fundamental classesMathworldPlanetmath of the upper and lower hemispheres, and the antipodal map exchanges these. Both of these map to the fundamental class of A, [A]∈Hn-1⁢(A;ℤ2). By the commutativity of the diagram, ∂⁡(f*⁢([R±]))=f*⁢(∂⁡([R±]))=f*⁢([A])=[A]. Thus f*⁢([R+])=[R±] and f*⁢([R-])=[R∓] since f commutes with the antipodal map. Thus f* is an isomorphism on Hn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2). Since Hn⁢(A,ℤ2)=0, by the exactness of the sequencePlanetmathPlanetmath i:Hn⁢(Sn;ℤ2)→Hn⁢(Sn,A;ℤ2) is injectivePlanetmathPlanetmath, and so by the commutativity of the diagram (or equivalently by the 5-lemma) f*:Hn⁢(Sn;ℤ2)→Hn⁢(Sn;ℤ2) is an isomorphism. Thus f has odd degree.

The other statement of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem is:

There is no odd map Sn→Sn-1.

Proof: If f where such a map, consider f restricted to the equator A of Sn. This is an odd map from Sn-1 to Sn-1 and thus has odd degree. But the map

f*⁢Hn-1⁢(A)→Hn-1⁢(Sn-1)

factors through Hn-1⁢(Sn)=0, and so must be zero. Thus f|A has degree 0, a contradictionMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath.

Title proof of Borsuk-Ulam theorem
Canonical name ProofOfBorsukUlamTheorem
Date of creation 2013-03-22 13:10:33
Last modified on 2013-03-22 13:10:33
Owner bwebste (988)
Last modified by bwebste (988)
Numerical id 5
Author bwebste (988)
Entry type Proof
Classification msc 54C99