improper integral

The Riemann integral of a function f:I→𝐑


is defined when f is bounded and I=[a,b]βŠ‚π‘ is a compact interval. If I is any interval of 𝐑 and f is bounded on every compact subset of I (for example f is continuousMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath), then we can define the concept of improper integral of f on I by approximation of I with compact sets.

Let I=(a,b) with a∈[-∞,+∞) and b∈(-∞,+∞] and let f be a continuous function on I. Given x,y∈I we know that the function f is Riemann integrable on [a,b]; hence we can define the improper integral of f on I as


Notice that the limit is taken in two variables. In the case when I is compact this is the usual Riemann integral on I=[a,b] (because the integral function is continuous). So there is no ambiguity in using the same simbol for improper integrals and usual Riemann integrals (but we will see that there is an ambiguity when dealing with Lebesgue integralsMathworldPlanetmath). Similarly, in the case when the interval I is semi-open, i.e. when I=[a,b) with a>-∞, the definition clearly reduces to


which is a limit in one variable.

Notice also that an improper integral can be infiniteMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath or can possibly not exist (even thought f is continuous).

The definition may be extended to the case when I is the union of a finite number of intervals I=I1βˆͺ…⁒IN by summing up the improper integrals on every interval:


In the case when I=𝐑 (or more generally when I has some symmetry), one can define the symmetric improper integral as


This limit can exist in some cases when the improper integral (not symmetric) fails to exist.

1 Examples

Given I=(0,1], f⁒(t)=1/t one has:

∫(0,1]1t⁒𝑑t =limxβ†’0+⁑∫x11t⁒𝑑t

Given I=[1,+∞), f⁒(t)=(sin⁑t)/t one can check that the improper integral ∫If⁒(t)⁒𝑑t exists and is finite but the improper integral ∫I|f⁒(t)|⁒𝑑t is infinite. In particular this function is not summable (in the sense of Lebesgue integrals) on the interval I.

The function f⁒(t)=t/(1+t2) has no improper integral in I=𝐑. But since f⁒(t)=-f⁒(-t) one can easily check that the symmetric integral is zero:

Title improper integral
Canonical name ImproperIntegral
Date of creation 2013-03-22 12:30:06
Last modified on 2013-03-22 12:30:06
Owner paolini (1187)
Last modified by paolini (1187)
Numerical id 8
Author paolini (1187)
Entry type Definition
Classification msc 40A10
Related topic CauchyPrinciplePartIntegral
Related topic ExampleOfUsingResidueTheorem
Related topic FunctionXx