alternative definitions of countable
The following are alternative ways of characterizing a countable set.
Proposition 1.
Let be a set and the set of natural numbers. The following are equivalent:
-
1.
there is a surjection from to .
-
2.
there is an injection from to .
-
3.
either is finite or there is a bijection between and .
Proof.
First notice that if were the empty set, then any map to or from is empty, so vacuously. Now, suppose that .
. Suppose is a surjection. For each , let be the set . Since is a subset of , which is well-ordered, itself is well-ordered, and thus has a least element (keep in mind , the existence of is guaranteed, so that as well). Let be this least element. Then is a well-defined mapping from to . It is one-to-one, for if , then .
. Suppose is one-to-one. So is at most a singleton for every . If it is a singleton, identify with that element. Otherwise, identify with a designated element (remember is non-empty). Define a function by . By the discussion above, is a well-defined element of , and therefore is well-defined. is onto because for every , .
is clear.
. Let be an injection. Then is either finite or infinite. If is finite, so is , since they are equinumerous. Suppose is infinite. Since , it is well-ordered. The (induced) well-ordering on implies that , where .
Now, define as follows, for each , is the element in such that . So is well-defined. Next, is injective. For if , then , implying . Finally, is a surjection, for if we pick any , then , meaning that for some , so . ∎
Therefore, countability can be defined in terms of either of the above three statements.
Note that the axiom of choice is not needed in the proof of , since the selection of an element in is definite, not arbitrary.
For example, we show that is countable. By the proposition above, we either need to find a surjection , or an injection . Actually, in this case, we can find both:
-
1.
the function given by where is surjective. First, the function is well-defined, for every positive integer has a unique representation as the product of a power of and an odd number. It is surjective because for every , we see that .
-
2.
the function given by is clearly injective.
Note that the injectivity of , as well as being well-defined, rely on the unique factorization of integers by prime numbers. In this entry (http://planetmath.org/ProductOfCountableSets), we actually find a bijection between and .
As a corollary, we record the following:
Corollary 1.
Let be sets, a function.
-
•
If is an injection, and is countable, so is .
-
•
If is a surjection, and countable, so is .
The proof is left to the reader.
Title | alternative definitions of countable |
---|---|
Canonical name | AlternativeDefinitionsOfCountable |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 19:02:49 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 19:02:49 |
Owner | CWoo (3771) |
Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | CWoo (3771) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 03E10 |