alternative definitions of countable
The following are alternative ways of characterizing a countable set.
Proposition 1.
Let A be a set and N the set of natural numbers. The following are equivalent:
-
1.
there is a surjection from ℕ to A.
-
2.
there is an injection from A to ℕ.
-
3.
either A is finite or there is a bijection between A and ℕ.
Proof.
First notice that if A were the empty set, then any map to or from A is empty, so (1)⇔(2)⇔(3) vacuously. Now, suppose that A≠∅.
(1)⇒(2). Suppose f:ℕ→A is a surjection. For each a∈A, let f-1(a) be the set {n∈ℕ∣f(n)=a}. Since f-1(a) is a subset of ℕ, which is well-ordered, f-1(a) itself is well-ordered, and thus has a least element (keep in mind A≠∅, the existence of a∈A is guaranteed, so that f-1(a)≠∅ as well). Let g(a) be this least element. Then a↦g(a) is a well-defined mapping from A to ℕ. It is one-to-one, for if g(a)=g(b)=n, then a=f(n)=b.
(2)⇒(1). Suppose g:A→ℕ is one-to-one. So g-1(n) is at most a singleton for every n∈ℕ. If it is a singleton, identify g-1(n) with that element. Otherwise, identify g-1(n) with a designated element a0∈A (remember A is non-empty). Define a function f:ℕ→A by f(n):=. By the discussion above, is a well-defined element of , and therefore is well-defined. is onto because for every , .
is clear.
. Let be an injection. Then is either finite or infinite. If is finite, so is , since they are equinumerous. Suppose is infinite. Since , it is well-ordered. The (induced) well-ordering on implies that , where .
Now, define as follows, for each , is the element in such that . So is well-defined. Next, is injective. For if , then , implying . Finally, is a surjection, for if we pick any , then , meaning that for some , so . ∎
Therefore, countability can be defined in terms of either of the above three statements.
Note that the axiom of choice is not needed in the proof of , since the selection of an element in is definite, not arbitrary.
For example, we show that is countable. By the proposition
above, we either need to find a surjection , or an injection . Actually, in this case, we can find both:
-
1.
the function given by where is surjective. First, the function is well-defined, for every positive integer has a unique representation as the product
of a power of and an odd number
. It is surjective because for every , we see that .
-
2.
the function given by is clearly injective.
Note that the injectivity of , as well as being well-defined, rely on the unique factorization of integers by prime numbers. In this entry (http://planetmath.org/ProductOfCountableSets), we actually find a bijection between and .
As a corollary, we record the following:
Corollary 1.
Let be sets, a function.
-
•
If is an injection, and is countable, so is .
-
•
If is a surjection, and countable, so is .
The proof is left to the reader.
Title | alternative definitions of countable |
---|---|
Canonical name | AlternativeDefinitionsOfCountable |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 19:02:49 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 19:02:49 |
Owner | CWoo (3771) |
Last modified by | CWoo (3771) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | CWoo (3771) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 03E10 |