Birkhoff prime ideal theorem


Birkhoff Prime Ideal Theorem. Let L be a distributive latticeMathworldPlanetmath and I a proper lattice ideal of L. Pick any element a∉I. Then there is a prime idealMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath P in L such that I⊆P and a∉P.

Proof.

If I is prime, then we are done. Let S:={J∣J⁢ is an ideal in ⁢L⁢, and ⁢a∉J}. Then I∈S. Order S by inclusion. This turns S into a poset. Let C be a chain in S. Let K=⋃C. If x,y∈K, then x∈J1 and y∈J2 for some ideals J1,J2∈C. Since C is a chain, we may assume that J1⊆J2, so that x∈J2 as well. This means x∨y∈J2⊆K. Next, assume x∈K and y≤x. Then x∈J for some ideal J∈C, so that y∈J⊆K also. This shows that K is an ideal. If a∈K, then a∈J for some J∈C⊆S, contradicting the definition of S. So a∉K and K∈S also. This shows that every chain in S has an upper bound. We can now appeal to Zorn’s lemma, and conclude that S has a maximal elementMathworldPlanetmath, say P.

We now want to show that P is the candidate that we are seeking: P is a prime ideal in L and a∉P. Since P∈S, P is an ideal such that a∉P. So the only thing left to prove is that P is prime. This amounts to showing that if x∧y∈P, then x∈P or y∈P. Suppose not: x,y∉P. Let Q1 be the ideal generated by elements of P and x, and Q2 the ideal generated by P and y. Since Q1 and Q2 properly contain P, a∈Q1 and a∈Q2. Write a≤p1∨x and a≤p2∨y, where p1,p2∈P. Then a∨p2≤(p1∨p2)∨x and a∨p1≤(p1∨p2)∨y. Take the meet of these two expressions, and we obtain (a∨p2)∧(a∨p1)≤((p1∨p2)∨x)∧((p1∨p2)∨y). Since L is distributive, on the left hand side, we get a∨(p1∧p2). On the right hand side, we have (p1∨p2)∨(x∧y)∈P. As the left hand side is less than or equal to the right hand side, we get that a∨(p1∧p2)∈P. Since a≤a∨(p1∧p2)∈P, a∈P, a contradictionMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath. Therefore, P is prime and the proof is completePlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath. ∎

In the proof, we use the fact that, an element a∈L belongs to the ideal generated by ideals Ik iff a is less than or equal to a finite join of elements, each of which belongs to some Ik.

Remarks.

  1. 1.

    The theoremMathworldPlanetmath can be generalized: if we use a subset S∩I=∅ instead of an element a∉I, there is a prime ideal P containing I but excluding S.

  2. 2.

    Birkhoff’s prime ideal theorem has been shown to be equivalentMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath to the axiom of choiceMathworldPlanetmath, under ZF.

Title Birkhoff prime ideal theorem
Canonical name BirkhoffPrimeIdealTheorem
Date of creation 2013-03-22 17:02:18
Last modified on 2013-03-22 17:02:18
Owner CWoo (3771)
Last modified by CWoo (3771)
Numerical id 11
Author CWoo (3771)
Entry type Theorem
Classification msc 06D05
Classification msc 03E25
Related topic DistributiveLattice