direct limit of algebraic systems


An immediate generalizationPlanetmathPlanetmath of the concept of the direct limitMathworldPlanetmath of a direct family of sets is the direct limit of a direct family of algebraic systems.

Direct Family of Algebraic Systems

The definition is almost identical to that of a direct family of sets, except that functions ϕi⁢j are now homomorphismsMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath. For completeness, we will spell out the definition in its entirety.

Let 𝒜={Ai∣i∈I} be a family of algebraic systems of the same type (say, they are all O-algebrasMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath), indexed by a non-empty set I. 𝒜 is said to be a direct family if

  1. 1.

    I is a directed setMathworldPlanetmath,

  2. 2.

    whenever i≤j in I, there is a homomorphism ϕi⁢j:Ai→Aj,

  3. 3.

    ϕi⁢i is the identityPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath on Ai,

  4. 4.

    if i≤j≤k, then ϕj⁢k∘ϕi⁢j=ϕi⁢k.

An example of this is a direct family of sets. A homomorphism between two sets is just a function between the sets.

Direct Limit of Algebraic Systems

Let 𝒜 be a direct family of algebraic systems Ai, indexed by I (i∈I). Take the disjoint unionMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath of the underlying sets of each algebraic system, and call it A. Next, a binary relationMathworldPlanetmath ∼ is defined on A as follows:

given that a∈Ai and b∈Aj, a∼b iff there is Ak such that ϕi⁢k⁢(a)=ϕj⁢k⁢(b).

It is shown here (http://planetmath.org/DirectLimitOfSets) that ∼ is an equivalence relationMathworldPlanetmath on A, so we can take the quotient A/∼, and denote it by A∞. Elements of A∞ are denoted by [a]I or [a] when there is no confusion, where a∈A. So A∞ is just the direct limit of Ai considered as sets.

Next, we want to turn A∞ into an O-algebra. Corresponding to each set of n-ary operationsMathworldPlanetmath ωi defined on Ai for all i∈I, we define an n-ary operation ω on A∞ as follows:

for i=1,…,n, pick ai∈Aj⁢(i), j⁢(i)∈I. Let J:={j⁢(i)∣i=1,…,n}. Since I is directed and J is finite, J has an upper bound j∈I. Let αi=ϕj⁢(i)⁢j⁢(ai). Define

ω⁢([a1],…,[an]):=[ωj⁢(α1,…,αn)].
Proposition 1.

ω is a well-defined n-ary operation on A∞.

Proof.

Suppose [b1]=[a1],…,[bn]=[an]. Let αi be defined as above, and let a:=ωj⁢(α1,…,αn)∈Aj. Similarly, βi are defined: βi:=ϕk⁢(i)⁢k⁢(bi)∈Ak, where bi∈Ak⁢(i). Let b:=ωk⁢(β1,…,βn)∈Ak. We want to show that a∼b.

Since ai∼bi, αi∼βi. So there is ci:=ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(i)⁢(αi)=ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(i)⁢(βi)∈Aℓ⁢(i). Let ℓ be the upper bound of the set {ℓ⁢(1),…,ℓ⁢(n)} and define γi:=ϕℓ⁢(i)⁢ℓ⁢(ci)∈Aℓ. Then

ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(a) = ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(ωj⁢(α1,…,αn))
= ωℓ⁢(ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(α1),…,ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(αn))
= ωℓ⁢(ϕℓ⁢(1)⁢ℓ∘ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(1)⁢(α1),…,ϕℓ⁢(n)⁢ℓ∘ϕj⁢ℓ⁢(n)⁢(αn))
= ωℓ⁢(ϕℓ⁢(1)⁢ℓ⁢(c1),…,ϕℓ⁢(n)⁢ℓ⁢(cn))
= ωℓ⁢(ϕℓ⁢(1)⁢ℓ∘ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(1)⁢(β1),…,ϕℓ⁢(n)⁢ℓ∘ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(n)⁢(βn))
= ωℓ⁢(ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(β1),…,ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(βn))
= ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(ωk⁢(β1,…,βn))
= ϕk⁢ℓ⁢(b),

which shows that a∼b. ∎

Definition. Let 𝒜 be a direct family of algebraic systems of the same type (say O) indexed by I. The O-algebra A∞ constructed above is called the direct limit of 𝒜. A∞ is alternatively written lim→⁡Ai.

Remark. Dually, one can define an inverse family of algebraic systems, and its inverse limitMathworldPlanetmath. The inverse limit of an inverse family 𝒜 is written A∞ or lim←⁡Ai.

Title direct limit of algebraic systems
Canonical name DirectLimitOfAlgebraicSystems
Date of creation 2013-03-22 16:53:56
Last modified on 2013-03-22 16:53:56
Owner CWoo (3771)
Last modified by CWoo (3771)
Numerical id 7
Author CWoo (3771)
Entry type Definition
Classification msc 08B25
Synonym direct system of algebraic systems
Synonym inverse system of algebraic systems
Synonym projective system of algebraic systems
Related topic DirectLimitOfSets
Defines direct family of algebraic systems
Defines inverse family of algebraic systems
Defines inverse limit of algebraic systems