ideals contained in a union of ideals
Assume that is a commutative ring.
Lemma. Let , , be ideals in such that . Then or .
Proof. Assume that this is not true. Then there are such that , and , . Obviously and without loss of generality we may assume that . Then . Contradiction.
Remark. This lemma is also true if we exchange ring with a group and ideals with subgroups (because we didn’t use multiplication and commutativity of addition in proof).
Proposition. Let , be ideals in such that each is prime. If , then there exists such that .
Proof. We will use the induction on . For our lemma applies. Let . Assume that . For define
By our assumption (and induction hypothesis) for any . Thus for any there is such that .
Now for any define . Then we have
and thus there is such that . Since for any , then we have that
But is prime, so there is such that . Contradiction.
Counterexample. We will show, that if ’s are not prime, then the thesis no longer hold, even when . Consider the ring of polynomials in two variables over a simple field of order , i.e. . Let . For we shall write . Then it is easy to see, that
Let
It can be easily checked, that are all ideals and but obviously for any .
Title | ideals contained in a union of ideals |
---|---|
Canonical name | IdealsContainedInAUnionOfIdeals |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 19:03:55 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 19:03:55 |
Owner | joking (16130) |
Last modified by | joking (16130) |
Numerical id | 4 |
Author | joking (16130) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 13A15 |
Related topic | IdealIncludedInUnionOfPrimeIdeals |