a representation which is not completely reducible
If G is a finite group, and k is a field whose characteristic does divide the order of the group, then Maschke’s theorem fails. For example let V be the regular representation
of G, which can be thought of as functions from G to k, with the G action g⋅φ(g′)=φ(g-1g′). Then this representation
is not completely reducible.
There is an obvious trivial subrepresentation W of V, consisting of the constant functions. I claim that there is no complementary invariant subspace to this one. If W′ is such a subspace, then there is a homomorphism
φ:V→V/W′≅k. Now consider the characteristic function
of the identity
e∈G
δe(g)={1g=e0g≠e |
and ℓ=φ(δe) in V/W′. This is not zero since δ generates the representation V. By G-equivarience, φ(δg)=ℓ for all g∈G. Since
η=∑g∈Gη(g)δg |
for all η∈V,
W′=φ(η)=ℓ(∑g∈Gη(g)). |
Thus,
kerφ={η∈V|∑∈Gη(g)=0}. |
But since the characteristic of the field k divides the order of G, W≤W′, and thus could not possibly be complementary to it.
For example, if G=C2={e,f} then the invariant subspace of V is spanned by e+f. For characteristics other than 2, e-f spans a complementary subspace, but over characteristic 2, these elements are the same.
Title | a representation which is not completely reducible |
---|---|
Canonical name | ARepresentationWhichIsNotCompletelyReducible |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:31:47 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:31:47 |
Owner | bwebste (988) |
Last modified by | bwebste (988) |
Numerical id | 5 |
Author | bwebste (988) |
Entry type | Example |
Classification | msc 20C15 |