bad reduction
1 Singular Cubic Curves
Let E be a cubic curve over a field K with Weierstrass equation f(x,y)=0, where:
f(x,y)=y2+a1xy+a3y-x3-a2x2-a4x-a6 |
which has a singular point P=(x0,y0). This is equivalent
to:
∂f/∂x(P)=∂f/∂y(P)=0 |
and so we can write the Taylor expansion of f(x,y) at
(x0,y0) as follows:
f(x,y)-f(x0,y0) | = | λ1(x-x0)2+λ2(x-x0)(y-y0)+λ3(y-y0)2-(x-x0)3 | ||
= | [(y-y0)-α(x-x0)][(y-y0)-β(x-x0)]-(x-x0)3 |
for some λi∈K and α,β∈ˉK (an
algebraic closure of K).
Definition 1.
The singular point P is a node if α≠β. In this case there are two different tangent lines to E at P, namely:
y-y0=α(x-x0),y-y0=β(x-x0) |
If α=β then we say that P is a cusp, and there is a unique tangent line at P.
Note: See the entry for elliptic curve for examples of cusps and
nodes.
There is a very simple criterion to know whether a cubic curve in Weierstrass form is singular and to differentiate nodes from cusps:
Proposition 1.
Let E/K be given by a Weierstrass equation, and let Δ be
the discriminant and c4 as in the definition of Δ. Then:
-
1.
E is singular if and only if Δ=0,
-
2.
E has a node if and only if Δ=0 and c4≠0,
-
3.
E has a cusp if and only if Δ=0=c4.
Proof.
See [2], chapter III, Proposition 1.4, page 50.
∎
2 Reduction of Elliptic Curves
Let E/ℚ be an elliptic curve (we could work over any
number field K, but we choose ℚ for simplicity in the
exposition). Assume that E has a minimal model with Weierstrass equation:
y2+a1xy+a3y=x3+a2x2+a4x+a6 |
with coefficients in ℤ. Let p be a prime in ℤ. By reducing
each of the coefficients ai modulo p we obtain the equation
of a cubic curve ˜E over the finite field
𝔽p (the field with p elements).
Definition 2.
-
1.
If ˜E is a non-singular curve then ˜E is an elliptic curve over 𝔽p and we say that E has good reduction at p. Otherwise, we say that E has bad reduction at p.
-
2.
If ˜E has a cusp then we say that E has additive reduction at p.
-
3.
If ˜E has a node then we say that E has multiplicative reduction at p. If the slopes of the tangent lines (α and β as above) are in 𝔽p then the reduction
is said to be split multiplicative (and non-split otherwise).
From Proposition 1 we deduce the following:
Corollary 1.
Let E/Q be an elliptic curve with coefficients in Z. Let p∈Z be a prime. If E has bad reduction at p then p∣Δ.
Examples:
-
1.
E1:y2=x3+35x+5 has good reduction at p=7.
-
2.
However E1 has bad reduction at p=5, and the reduction is additive
(since modulo 5 we can write the equation as [(y-0)-0(x-0)]2-x3 and the slope is 0).
-
3.
The elliptic curve E2:y2=x3-x2+35 has bad multiplicative reduction at 5 and 7. The reduction at 5 is split, while the reduction at 7 is non-split. Indeed, modulo 5 we could write the equation as [(y-0)-2(x-0)][(y-0)+2(x-0)]-x3, being the slopes 2 and -2. However, for p=7 the slopes are not in 𝔽7 (√-1 is not in 𝔽7).
References
- 1 James Milne, Elliptic Curves, http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/math679.htmlonline course notes.
- 2 Joseph H. Silverman, The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
- 3 Joseph H. Silverman, Advanced Topics in the Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
- 4 Goro Shimura, Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Automorphic Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1971.
Title | bad reduction |
Canonical name | BadReduction |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:49:21 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:49:21 |
Owner | alozano (2414) |
Last modified by | alozano (2414) |
Numerical id | 12 |
Author | alozano (2414) |
Entry type | Definition |
Classification | msc 14H52 |
Related topic | EllipticCurve |
Related topic | JInvariant |
Related topic | HassesBoundForEllipticCurvesOverFiniteFields |
Related topic | TorsionSubgroupOfAnEllipticCurveInjectsInTheReductionOfTheCurve |
Related topic | ArithmeticOfEllipticCurves |
Related topic | SingularPointsOfPlaneCurve |
Defines | bad reduction |
Defines | good reduction |
Defines | cusp |
Defines | node |
Defines | multiplicative reduction |
Defines | additive reduction |