You are here
Home ›complete set of primitive orthogonal idempotents
Primary tabs
complete set of primitive orthogonal idempotents
Let be a unital algebra over a field . Recall that is an idempotent iff . If are idempotents, then we will say that they are orthogonal iff . Furthermore an idempotent is called primitive iff cannot be written as a sum where both are nonzero idempotents. An idempotent is called trivial iff it is either or .
Now assume that is an algebra such that
as right modules and for some , . Then , are orthogonal idempotents in and , . Furthermore is indecomposable (as a right module) if and only if is primitive. This can be easily generalized to any number (but finite) of summands.
If is additionally finite-dimensional, then
for some (unique up to isomorphism) right (ideals) indecomposable modules . It follows from the preceding that
for some and is a set of pairwise orthogonal, primitive idempotents. This set is called the complete set of primitive orthogonal idempotents of .
Mathematics Subject Classification
16S99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 16Sxx20C99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 20Cxx
13B99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 13Bxx
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


