cubic reciprocity law
In a ring ℤ/nℤ, a cubic residue is just a value of the function
x3 for some invertible element x of the ring. Cubic residues display
a reciprocity phenomenon similar to that seen with quadratic
residues
. But we need some preparation in order to state the cubic
reciprocity law.
ω will denote -1+i√32, which is one of the
complex cube roots of 1.
K will denote the ring K=ℤ[ω]. The elements of
K are the complex numbers a+bω
where a and b are integers. We define the norm N:K→ℤ by
N(a+bω)=a2-ab+b2 |
or equivalently
N(z)=zˉz. |
Whereas ℤ has only two units (meaning invertible elements), namely ±1, K has six, namely all the sixth roots of 1:
±1 |
and we know . Two nonzero elements
and of are said
to be associates if for some unit . This
is an equivalence relation
, and any nonzero element has six associates.
is a principal ring, hence has unique factorization
. Let us call
“irreducible
” if the condition implies
that or , but not both, is a unit.
It turns out that the irreducible elements of are (up to multiplication
by units):
– the number , which has norm 3. We will denote it by .
– positive real integers which are prime in . Such integers are called rational primes in .
– complex numbers where is a prime in and .
For example, is a prime in because its norm, 7, is prime in and is 1 mod 3; but 7 is not a prime in .
Now we need some convention whereby at most one of any six associates is called a prime. By convention, the following numbers are nominated:
– the number .
– rational primes (rather than their negative or complex associates).
– complex numbers where is prime in and
One can verify that this selection exists and is unambigous.
Next, we seek a three-valued function analogous to the
two-valued quadratic residue character .
Let be a prime in , with . If is any
element of such that , then
Since is a multiple of 3, we can define a function
by
is a character, called the cubic residue character mod . We have if and only if is a nonzero cube mod . (Compare Euler’s criterion.)
At last we can state this famous result of Eisenstein and Jacobi:
Theorem (Cubic Reciprocity Law): If and are any two distinct primes in , neither of them , then
The quadratic reciprocity law has two “supplements” which describe and . Likewise the cubic law has this supplement, due to Eisenstein:
Theorem: For any prime in , other than ,
where
Remarks: Some writers refer to our “irreducible” elements
as “primes” in ; what we have called primes, they call “primary primes”.
The quadratic reciprocity law would take a simpler form if we were to make a different convention on what is a prime in , a convention similar to the one in : a prime in is either 2 or an irreducible element of such that . The primes would then be 2, -3, 5, -7, -11, 13, …and the QRL would say simply
for any two distinct odd primes and .
Title | cubic reciprocity law |
---|---|
Canonical name | CubicReciprocityLaw |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:41:26 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:41:26 |
Owner | mathcam (2727) |
Last modified by | mathcam (2727) |
Numerical id | 7 |
Author | mathcam (2727) |
Entry type | Topic |
Classification | msc 11A15 |
Related topic | QuadraticReciprocityRule |
Defines | cubic residue |
Defines | cubic residue character |