You are here
Home ›derivations on a ring of continuous functions
Primary tabs
derivations on a ring of continuous functions
Let be a topological space and denote by the set of reals. Of course the set of all continuous functions is a -algebra. Let . By the symbol we will denote constant function at , i.e. is defined by .
Proposition. If is a -derivation, then for any .
Proof. Step one. We will prove that for any . Indeed
and thus . Now from linearity of we obtain that
Step two. If is continuous and , then is continuous and obviously Moreover, if then , but . Thus we may assume that for fixed .
Let . Now we will restrict only to such maps that .
Step three. We now decompose into sum of two nonnegative functions. Indeed, if is continuous, then define by the formula:
Of course both and are continous, nonnegative and . Thus
so it is enough to show that only for nonnegative and continuous functions.
Step four. Assume that is nonnegative, continuous and . Then there exists continuous such that (indeed and it is well defined, continuous map, because was nonnegative). Then we have
Now we have and thus
Now we can take any and repeat steps two, three and four to get that for any we have
and thus
which completes the proof.
Remark. Note that this proof cannot be repeated if we (for example) consider the set of all smooth functions on a smooth manifold , because , and need not be smooth.
Mathematics Subject Classification
17A36 Automorphisms, derivations, other operators16W25 Derivations, actions of Lie algebras
13N15 Derivations
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


