You are here
Home ›expansive
Primary tabs
expansive
If is a metric space, a homeomorphism is said to be expansive if there is a constant , called the expansivity constant, such that for any two points of , their -th iterates are at least apart for some integer ; i.e. if for any pair of points in there is such that .
The space is often assumed to be compact, since under that assumption expansivity is a topological property; i.e. any map which is topologically conjugate to is expansive if is expansive (possibly with a different expansivity constant).
If is a continuous map, we say that is positively expansive (or forward expansive) if there is such that, for any in , there is such that .
Remarks. The latter condition is much stronger than expansivity. In fact, one can prove that if is compact and is a positively expansive homeomorphism, then is finite (proof).
Mathematics Subject Classification
37B99 None of the above, but in MSC2010 section 37Bxx- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by Bruce Lee
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord
May 17
new image: sinx_approx.png by jeremyboden
new image: approximation_to_sinx by jeremyboden
new image: approximation_to_sinx by jeremyboden
new question: Solving the word problem for isomorphic groups by unlord
new image: LineDiagrams.jpg by m759
new image: ProjPoints.jpg by m759



Comments
Regarding the definition of (forward exansivity)
I think that you are missing a few details , such as if f is expansive
with regards to (X,d) then there is e
such that for every x != y there is n where d(f^n(x),f^n(y)>e.
Is this n universal or is n depends on x and y ?
if m>n does it mean that d(f^m(x),f^m(y))>e ?
If you dont demand either and you dont demand that f is continues
then there is an example where f is forward expansive on (X,d)
X compact and not finite.
The example is X cantor set d-the standard euclid metric.
We can consider X as 2^omega (infinite series of zeros or ones)
and the (forward) expansive map is the "shift left" map ,
a well known mixing map.
Re: Regarding the definition of (forward exansivity)
That's right; there was an error. In my last comment "map" should have been "homeomorphism". The idea is that if f is an homeomorphism then forward expansivity is much stronger than expansivity (if f is not homeo then there is no point in comparing them, since "expansivity" alone is not defined if f is not an homeo).