ideals contained in a union of radical ideals
Let be a commutative ring and an ideal. Recall that the radical of is defined as
It can be shown, that is again an ideal and . Let
Of course (because is contained in at least one maximal ideal![]()
) and it can be shown, that
Finaly, recall that an ideal is called radical, if .
Proof. Assume that this not true, i.e. for every we have . Then for any there exists such that (this follows from the fact, that and the characterization![]()
of radicals via prime ideals
![]()
). But for any we have and thus
Contradiction![]()
, since each is prime (see the parent object for details).
| Title | ideals contained in a union of radical ideals |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | IdealsContainedInAUnionOfRadicalIdeals |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 19:04:23 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 19:04:23 |
| Owner | joking (16130) |
| Last modified by | joking (16130) |
| Numerical id | 4 |
| Author | joking (16130) |
| Entry type | Corollary |
| Classification | msc 13A15 |