## You are here

Homeinvertible matrix

## Primary tabs

# invertible matrix

Let $R$ be a ring and $M$ an $m\times n$ matrix over $R$. $M$ is said to be *left invertible* if there is an $n\times m$ matrix such that $NM=I_{n}$, where $I_{n}$ is the $n\times n$ identity matrix. We call $N$ a *left inverse* of $M$. Similarly, $M$ is *right invertible* if there is an $n\times m$ matrix $P$, called a *right inverse* of $M$, such that $MP=I_{m}$, where $I_{m}$ is the $m\times m$ identity matrix. If $M$ is both left invertible and right invertible, we say that $M$ is *invertible*. If $R$ is an associative ring, and $M$ is invertible, then it has a unique left and a unique right inverse, and they are in fact equal, we call this matrix the *inverse* of $M$.

If $R$ is a division ring, then it can be shown that for any matrix $M$ over $R$, $M$ is left invertible iff it is invertible iff it is right invertible. In addition, when $M$ is invertible, it is a square matrix. Furthermore, $R$ is a field iff for any square matrix $M$ (over $R$), $M$ is invertible implies that $M^{T}$, its transpose, is invertible as well. Invertibility of matrices over a division ring can also be determined by quantities known as ranks and determinants. It can be shown that a matrix over a division ring is invertible iff its left row rank (or right column rank) is full iff its determinant is non-zero. For example, the $2\times 2$ matrix

$\begin{pmatrix}1&j\\ i&k\end{pmatrix}$ |

over the Hamiltonian quaternions is not invertible, as its determinant $k-ji=0$. It is interesting to note that, however, its transpose

$\begin{pmatrix}1&i\\ j&k\end{pmatrix}$ |

is invertible, whose determinant is $2k\neq 0$. The relationship between determinants and matrix invertibility can also be used to prove the following: preservation of matrix invertibility upon matrix transposition implies commutativity of division ring $D$. This can be done as follows: given any $a,b\in D$, the $2\times 2$ matrix

$\begin{pmatrix}ab&b\\ a&1\end{pmatrix}$ |

is not invertible because its determinant is $0$. Therefore, its transpose

$\begin{pmatrix}ab&a\\ b&1\end{pmatrix}$ |

is also not invertible, and its determinant is $0=ab-ba$, whence $D$ is a field.

## Mathematics Subject Classification

15-01*no label found*15A09

*no label found*15A33

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Prove a formula is part of the Gentzen System by LadyAnne

Mar 30

new question: A problem about Euler's totient function by mbhatia

new problem: Problem: Show that phi(a^n-1), (where phi is the Euler totient function), is divisible by n for any natural number n and any natural number a >1. by mbhatia

new problem: MSC browser just displays "No articles found. Up to ." by jaimeglz

Mar 26

new correction: Misspelled name by DavidSteinsaltz

Mar 21

new correction: underline-typo by Filipe

Mar 19

new correction: cocycle pro cocyle by pahio

Mar 7

new image: plot W(t) = P(waiting time <= t) (2nd attempt) by robert_dodier

new image: expected waiting time by robert_dodier

new image: plot W(t) = P(waiting time <= t) by robert_dodier