You are here
Home ›juxtaposition of automata
Primary tabs
juxtaposition of automata
Let and be two automata. We define the juxtaposition of and , written , as the sextuple , as follows:
1. , where denotes disjoint union,
2. ,
3. given by
-
if , and otherwise,
-
,
-
, and
-
otherwise (where ).
-
4. ,
5. .
Because and are considered as disjoint subsets of , . Also, from the definition above, we see that is an automaton with -transitions.
The way works is as follows: a word , where and , is fed into . first reads as if it were read by , via transition function . If is accepted by , then one of its accepting states will be used as the initial state for when it reads . The word is accepted by when is accepted by .
Visually, the state diagram of combines the state diagram of with the state diagram of by adding an edge from each final node of to each of the start nodes of with label (the -transition).
Proposition 1.
Proof.
Suppose is a words such that and . If , then for some . Since and , we have, by the definition of , that , which shows that and . But , by the definition of again, we also have , which implies that . As a result, .
Conversely, if and , then for any , , which has non-empty intersection with . This means that , and finally , which has non-empty intersection with by assumption. This shows that , or . ∎
Mathematics Subject Classification
03D05 Automata and formal grammars in connection with logical questions68Q45 Formal languages and automata
- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new question: Sorry to steal a few minutes of your time for this question, but i honestly don't know what else to do. by Whrazithar
new question: equality of the determinants of submatrices of an orthogonal matrix by ismayli
Jun 11
new correction: Typo by suitangi
Jun 2
new question: Creating another set with same cardinality. by hkkass
Jun 1
new image: ProblemOneRevised by unlord
new Education: Chapter II by rspuzio
May 31
new collection: The Calculus by Davis and Brenke by rspuzio
new question: Proofs by weixifan
new question: Summation Integration Question by trevor.nickle
May 27
new correction: typo+finite measure hypothesis by Filipe


