Leibniz notation
Leibniz notation centers around the concept of a differential![]()
element
![]()
.
The differential element of is represented by .
You might think of as being an infinitesimal![]()
change in . It is important
to note that is an operator, not a variable. So, when you see ,
you can’t automatically write as a replacement .
We use or to represent the derivative![]()
of a
function with respect to .
We are dividing two numbers infinitely close to 0, and arriving at a finite answer. is another operator that can be thought of just a change in . When we take the limit of as approaches 0, we get an infinitesimal change .
Leibniz notation shows a wonderful use in the following example:
The two s can be cancelled out to arrive at the original derivative.
This is the Leibniz notation for the Chain Rule![]()
.
Leibniz notation shows up in the most common way of representing an integral,
The is in fact a differential element. Let’s start with a derivative that we know (since is an antiderivative of ).
We can think of as the differential element of area. Since ,
the element of area is a rectangle![]()
, with as its dimensions. Integration is
the sum of all these infinitely thin elements of area along a certain interval
![]()
. The result: a finite number.
(a diagram is deserved here)
One clear advantage of this notation is seen when finding the length of a curve.
The formula![]()
is often seen as the following:
The length is the sum of all the elements, , of length. If we have a function
, the length element is usually written as . If we
modify this a bit, we get . Graphically, we
could say that the length element is the hypotenuse![]()
of a right triangle
![]()
with one
leg being the element, and the other leg being the element.
(another diagram would be nice!)
There are a few caveats, such as if you want to take the value of a derivative. Compare to the prime notation.
A second derivative is represented as follows:
The other derivatives follow as can be expected: , etc. You might think this is a little sneaky, but it is the notation. Properly using these terms can be interesting. For example, what is ? We could turn it into or . Either way, we get .
| Title | Leibniz notation |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | LeibnizNotation |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 12:30:47 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 12:30:47 |
| Owner | mathcam (2727) |
| Last modified by | mathcam (2727) |
| Numerical id | 6 |
| Author | mathcam (2727) |
| Entry type | Topic |
| Classification | msc 26A24 |
| Related topic | Derivative |
| Related topic | FixedPointsOfNormalFunctions |
| Related topic | Differential |