You are here
Home ›Peano arithmetic
Primary tabs
Peano arithmetic
Peano’s axioms are a definition of the set of natural numbers, denoted . From these axioms Peano arithmetic on natural numbers can be derived.
1. (0 is a natural number)
2. For each , there exists exactly one , called the successor of
3. (0 is not the successor of any natural number)
4. if and only if .
5. (axiom of induction) If and and implies , then .
The successor of is sometimes denoted instead of . We then have , , and so on.
Peano arithmetic consists of statements derived via these axioms. For instance, from these axioms we can define addition and multiplication on natural numbers. Addition is defined as
Addition defined in this manner can then be proven to be both associative and commutative.
Multiplication is
This definition of multiplication can also be proven to be both associative and commutative, and it can also be shown to be distributive over addition.
Mathematics Subject Classification
03F30 First-order arithmetic and fragments- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)
- Other useful stuff
Recent Activity
new correction: typo? by Filipe
May 22
new question: Linear Algebra Combination Problem! by Aleph Zero
new question: Computation of $\varphi(2000)$ by unlord
May 21
new question: pure subgroups by lvoyster
new correction: Typo in M\"obius function? by Aleph Zero
new collection: analytic number theory by Aleph Zero
May 20
new question: Taylor's Series Query! by unlord
new question: Laplace transform by J
new question: Residue Calculus by J
May 19
new Education: Project: PlanetMath Outlines Series by unlord



Comments
use of 0 as the start of the natural numbers.
Peano originally didn't use 0 as the start of the Natural numbers. He used 1 in axioms 1 and 3. The use of 0 as the beginning of the "natural" numbers is a set theoretic concept, and as such is not "natural" in the least. The idea of zero as a number took ages to develop, and is anything but natural.
Also, in Peano Arithmetic, you have to define 1 as the successor of 0 before you can use it and there is no justification from the axioms for using it in the definitions of addition and multiplication rather than something else. But by starting with 1 as the first natural number, the definitions follows from the axioms as 1 generates all the natural numbers by successive addition, which is something 0 doesn't do.
I would prefer that you call the Axioms in this section The Extended Paeno Axioms, since these are not what he wrote in his papers.