proof of convergence theorem
Let us show the equivalence of (2) and (3). First, the proof that (3) implies (2) is a direct calculation. Next, let us show that (2) implies (3): Suppose in , and if is a compact set in , and is a sequence in such that for any multi-index , we have
in the supremum norm as . For a contradiction, suppose there is a compact set in such that for all constants and there exists a function such that
Then, for we obtain functions in such that Thus for all , so for , we have
It follows that for any multi-index with . Thus satisfies our assumption, whence should tend to . However, for all , we have . This contradiction completes the proof.
Title | proof of convergence theorem |
---|---|
Canonical name | ProofOfConvergenceTheorem |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 13:44:36 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 13:44:36 |
Owner | matte (1858) |
Last modified by | matte (1858) |
Numerical id | 10 |
Author | matte (1858) |
Entry type | Proof |
Classification | msc 46-00 |
Classification | msc 46F05 |