proof of estimating theorem of contour integral
WLOG consider a parameterization of the curve along which the integral is evaluated with . This amounts to a canonical parameterization and is always possible.
Since the integral is independent of re-parameterization11apart from a possible sign change due to exchange of orientation of the path the result will be completely general.
With this in mind, the contour integral can be explicitly written as
| (1) |
where is the arc length![]()
of the curve .
Consider the set of all continuous functions![]()
as a vector space
![]()
22axioms are trivial to verify, we can define an inner product
![]()
in it via
| (2) |
The axioms are easy to verify:
-
•
-
•
- •
With all this in mind, equation 1 can be written as
| (3) |
Where by definition is the norm associated with the inner product defined previously.
Using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality we can write that
| (4) |
But since by assumption the parameterization is canonic, .
On the other hand , where for every point on .
The previous paragraphs imply that
| (5) |
which is the result we aimed to prove.
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality says more, it also says that where is a constant.
So if then , where is a constant.
If is a canonical parameterization and we get the absolute modulus (which must be constant) and all that remains is to find the phase of which must also be constant.
| Title | proof of estimating theorem of contour integral |
|---|---|
| Canonical name | ProofOfEstimatingTheoremOfContourIntegral |
| Date of creation | 2013-03-22 15:46:02 |
| Last modified on | 2013-03-22 15:46:02 |
| Owner | cvalente (11260) |
| Last modified by | cvalente (11260) |
| Numerical id | 22 |
| Author | cvalente (11260) |
| Entry type | Proof |
| Classification | msc 30E20 |
| Classification | msc 30A99 |