rational Briggsian logarithms of integers
Theorem. The only positive integers, whose Briggsian logarithms are rational, are the powers (http://planetmath.org/GeneralAssociativity) 1, 10, 100,… of ten. The logarithms
of other positive integers are thus irrational (in fact, transcendental numbers
). The same concerns also the Briggsian logarithms of the positive fractional numbers.
Proof. Let a be a positive integer such that
lga=mn∈ℚ, |
where m and n are positive integers. By the definition of logarithm, we have 10mn=a, which is equivalent (http://planetmath.org/Equivalent3) to
10m=2m⋅5m=an. |
According to the fundamental theorem of arithmetics, the integer an must have exactly m prime divisors 2 and equally many prime divisors 5. This is not possible otherwise than that also a itself consists of a same amount of prime divisors 2 and 5, i.e. the number a is an integer power of 10.
As for any rational number ab (with a,b∈ℤ+), if one had
lgab=mn∈ℚ, |
then
(ab)n=10m, |
and it is apparent that the rational number ab has to be an integer, more accurately a power of ten. Therefore the logarithms of all fractional numbers are irrational.
Note. An analogous theorem concerns e.g. the binary logarithms (lba). As for the natural logarithms of positive rationals (lna), they all are transcendental numbers except ln1=0.
Title | rational Briggsian logarithms of integers |
---|---|
Canonical name | RationalBriggsianLogarithmsOfIntegers |
Date of creation | 2013-03-22 17:39:55 |
Last modified on | 2013-03-22 17:39:55 |
Owner | pahio (2872) |
Last modified by | pahio (2872) |
Numerical id | 14 |
Author | pahio (2872) |
Entry type | Theorem |
Classification | msc 11A51 |
Related topic | Transcendental |
Related topic | RationalSineAndCosine |
Related topic | AllUnnaturalSquareRootsAreIrrational |
Related topic | BriggsianLogarithms |