## You are here

Homethe groups of real numbers

## Primary tabs

# the groups of real numbers

###### Proposition 1.

The additive group of real number $\langle\mathbb{R},+\rangle$ is isomorphic to the multiplicative group of positive real numbers $\langle\mathbb{R}^{+},\times\rangle$.

###### Proof.

Let $f(x)=e^{x}$. This maps the group $\langle\mathbb{R},+\rangle$ to the group $\langle\mathbb{R}^{+},\times\rangle$. As $f$ has an inverse $f^{{-1}}(x)=\ln x$ we observe $f$ is invertible. Furthermore, $f(x+y)=e^{{x+y}}=e^{x}e^{y}=f(x)f(y)$ so $f$ is a homomorphism. Thus $f$ is an isomorphism. ∎

###### Corollary 2.

The multiplicative group of non-zero real number $\mathbb{R}^{\times}$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_{2}\oplus\langle\mathbb{R},+\rangle$.

###### Proof.

Use the map $f:\mathbb{Z}_{2}\oplus\langle\mathbb{R},+\rangle\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\times}$ defined by $f(s,r)=(-1)^{s}e^{r}$.^{1}^{1}We write $(-1)^{s}$ to mean $(-1)^{{s^{{\prime}}}}$ for any integer $s^{{\prime}}$ representative of the equivalence class of $s$ in
$\mathbb{Z}_{2}$. Then

$f((s_{1},r_{1})+(s_{2},r_{2}))=f(s_{1}+s_{2},r_{1}+r_{2})=(-1)^{{s_{1}+s_{2}}}% e^{{r_{1}+r_{2}}}=(-1)^{{s_{1}}}e^{{r_{1}}}(-1)^{{s_{2}}}e^{{r_{2}}}=f(s_{1},r% _{1})f(s_{2},r_{2})$ |

so that $f$ is a homomorphism. Furthermore, $f^{{-1}}(r)=(\operatorname{sign}r,\ln|r|)$ is the inverse of $f$ so that $f$ is bijective and thus an isomorphism of groups. ∎

## Mathematics Subject Classification

54C30*no label found*26-00

*no label found*12D99

*no label found*

- Forums
- Planetary Bugs
- HS/Secondary
- University/Tertiary
- Graduate/Advanced
- Industry/Practice
- Research Topics
- LaTeX help
- Math Comptetitions
- Math History
- Math Humor
- PlanetMath Comments
- PlanetMath System Updates and News
- PlanetMath help
- PlanetMath.ORG
- Strategic Communications Development
- The Math Pub
- Testing messages (ignore)

- Other useful stuff

## Recent Activity

new question: Prime numbers out of sequence by Rubens373

Oct 7

new question: Lorenz system by David Bankom

Oct 19

new correction: examples and OEIS sequences by fizzie

Oct 13

new correction: Define Galois correspondence by porton

Oct 7

new correction: Closure properties on languages: DCFL not closed under reversal by babou

new correction: DCFLs are not closed under reversal by petey

Oct 2

new correction: Many corrections by Smarandache

Sep 28

new question: how to contest an entry? by zorba

new question: simple question by parag