theory of rational and irrational numbers


The following entry is some sort of index of articles in PlanetMath about the basic theory of rational and irrational numbers, and it should be studied together with its complement: the theory of algebraic and transcendental numbers (http://planetmath.org/TheoryOfAlgebraicNumbers). The reader should follow the links in each bullet-point to learn more about each topic. For a somewhat deeper approach to the subject, the reader should read about Algebraic Number TheoryMathworldPlanetmath. In this entry we will concentrate on the properties of the complex numbersMathworldPlanetmathPlanetmath and the extensionPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath /.

1 Basic Definitions

  1. 1.

    A number is said to be rational if it can be expressed as a quotient of integers (with non-zero denominator). The set of all rational numbers forms a field, denoted by .

  2. 2.

    Such rational numbers, which are not integers, may be expressed as sum of partial fractionsPlanetmathPlanetmath (the denominators being powers of distinct prime numbersMathworldPlanetmath).

  3. 3.

    The real numbers are the set of all possible decimal expansions (where we don’t allow any expansion to end in all 9’s). For the formal definition please see the entry real number (http://planetmath.org/RealNumber). The real numbers form a field, usually denoted by .

  4. 4.

    A real number is said to be irrational (http://planetmath.org/IrrationalNumber) if it is not rational, i.e. it cannot be expressed as a quotient of integers.  The decimal expansion is non-periodic for any irrational, but periodic for any rational number.

  5. 5.

    For example, 2 is irrational.

  6. 6.

    Commensurable numbers have a rational ratio.  See also http://planetmath.org/node/12150sine at irrational multiplesMathworldPlanetmath of full angle.

2 Small Results

  1. 1.

    The field is, up to an isomorphismPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmathPlanetmath, subfieldMathworldPlanetmath (prime subfieldMathworldPlanetmath) in every field where no sum of unities can be 0.  One may also say that is the least field of numbers.

  2. 2.

    2 is irrational (http://planetmath.org/SquareRootOf2IsIrrationalProof). Similarly d is irrational as long as d is not a perfect squareMathworldPlanetmath.

  3. 3.

    The sum of two square roots of positive squarefreeMathworldPlanetmath integers (http://planetmath.org/UsingThePrimitiveElementOfBiquadraticField) is irrational.

  4. 4.

    Rational and irrational:  the sum, differencePlanetmathPlanetmath, productPlanetmathPlanetmath (http://planetmath.org/Ring) and quotient of two non-zero real numbers, from which one is rational and the other irrational, is irrational.

  5. 5.

    There exists real functions, which are continuous at any irrational but discontinuousMathworldPlanetmath at any rational number (e.g. the Dirichlet’s functionMathworldPlanetmath).

  6. 6.

    Every irrational (and also rational) number is a limit of sequence of rational numbers (see real numbers (http://planetmath.org/RealNumber)).  An example:  the sequenceMathworldPlanetmath(1+11)1,(1+12)2,(1+13)3,converges to the number e.

  7. 7.

    The number e is irrational (this is not as difficult to prove as it is to show that e is transcendentalPlanetmathPlanetmath). In fact, if r{0} then er is also irrational (http://planetmath.org/ErIsIrrationalForRinmathbbQsetminus0). There is an easier way to show that e is not a quadratic irrational.

  8. 8.

    Every real transcendental numberMathworldPlanetmath (such as e) is irrational, but not all irrational numbers are transcendental — some (such as 2) are algebraic.

  9. 9.

    “Most” logarithmsMathworldPlanetmath (http://planetmath.org/RationalBriggsianLogarithmsOfIntegers) of positive integers are irrational (and transcendental).

  10. 10.

    If an is irrational then a is irrational (see here (http://planetmath.org/IfAnIsIrrationalThenAIsIrrational)).

  11. 11.

    A surprising fact: an irrational to an irrational power can be rational.

  12. 12.

    π and π2 are irrational (http://planetmath.org/PiAndPi2AreIrrational).

3 BIG Results

The irrational numbers are, in general, “easily” understood. The BIG theorems appear in the theory of transcendental numbers. Still, there are some open problems:  is Euler’s constant irrational? is π+e rational?

Title theory of rational and irrational numbers
Canonical name TheoryOfRationalAndIrrationalNumbers
Date of creation 2013-03-22 15:14:10
Last modified on 2013-03-22 15:14:10
Owner alozano (2414)
Last modified by alozano (2414)
Numerical id 15
Author alozano (2414)
Entry type Topic
Classification msc 11R04
Related topic TheoryOfAlgebraicNumbers
Related topic AlgebraicNumberTheory