area of a polygonal region
We consider only Euclidean geometry^{}.
A triangular region is a triangle^{} together with its interior. The sides of the triangle are called the edges of the region and the vertices of the triangle are called the vertices of the region.
A polygonal region is a plane figure that can be written as a union of a finite number of triangular regions, subject to a constraint. The constraint is that the triangular regions are nonoverlapping. That means that if two triangular regions intersect, then their intersection^{} is either a vertex or edge of each of the triangular regions.
A given polygonal region can of course be written as such a union in infinitely many ways.
We wish to assign a number to each polygonal region that corresponds to our intuitive idea of ”area”. To do that we first write down a set of postulates^{} that ”area” should satisfy and then show that the postulates can be satisfied. We let $\mathcal{R}$ denote the set of polygonal regions.

1.
There is a function $\alpha :\mathcal{R}\to \mathbb{R}$.

2.
$\alpha >0$.

3.
If two triangular regions are congruent^{}, then they have the same area.

4.
If two polygonal regions ${R}_{1}$ and ${R}_{2}$ are nonoverlapping then $\alpha ({R}_{1}\cup {R}_{2})=\alpha ({R}_{1})+\alpha ({R}_{2})$.

5.
If a square has edges of length 1, then its area is 1.
The fifth postulate is needed because if $\alpha $ satisfies the first 4 postulates, then so does $2\alpha $. So, this postulate serves to make $\alpha $ a unique function.
Theorem 1.
If a square has sides of length $s$ then its area is ${s}^{\mathrm{2}}$.
Proof. We first show that if a square has sides of length $\frac{1}{q}$ then its area is $\frac{1}{{q}^{2}}$. A unit square can be decomposed into ${q}^{2}$ squares, each having side of length $\frac{1}{q}$. Each of the smaller squares has the same area, $A$, by postulates 3 and 4. Hence,
$$1={q}^{2}A,$$ 
so that $A=\frac{1}{{q}^{2}}$. Next, if a square has sides of length $\frac{p}{q}$ then its area is $\frac{{p}^{2}}{{q}^{2}}$. This is because the square can be written as ${p}^{2}$ squares each having a side of length $\frac{1}{q}$. If $A$ is the area then
$$A={p}^{2}\frac{1}{{q}^{2}}=\frac{{p}^{2}}{{q}^{2}}.$$ 
Finally, let $T$ be a square of side $s$ and ${T}_{p/q}$ denote a square of side $\frac{p}{q}$ having one angle in common with $T$. In the following sequence^{} of statements, each statement is equivalent^{} to the next one:

1.
$$

2.
${T}_{p/q}\subset T.$

3.
$$

4.
$$

5.
$$
Hence, statements 1 and 5 are equivalent so that
$$s=\sqrt{\alpha (T)},$$ 
so that ${s}^{2}=\alpha (T)$. This proves the theorem^{}.
One can then proceed on the basis of the postulates to show the following sequence of results.
Rather than speak of the area of a triangular region or the area of a rectangle^{} region, we shall refer to the area of a triangle, or area of a rectangle, or other polygonal region, as is usually done.
Theorem 3.
The area of a right triangle is 1/2 product of the lengths of its legs.
Theorem 4.
The area of a triangle is 1/2 the product of any base and the corresponding altitude.
Theorem 5.
The area of a parallelogram^{} is the product of a base and the corresponding altitude.
Theorem 6.
The area of a trapezoid^{} is 1/2 the product of the altitude and the sum of the bases.
Theorem 7.
If two triangles are similar^{} then the ratio of their areas is the square of the ratio of any two corresponding sides.
What remains to do is to show that there is a function $\alpha $ that satisfies postulates 1 to 5. It might seem reasonable to just define the area of a rectangle, but rectangles are not useful for dissecting polygonal regions. The easier way to use triangles. So one defines the area of a triangle to be 1/2 the product of the base and its corresponding altitude. For this to be welldefined one has to show first that the product of a base and altitude (for a given triangle) does not depend on which base is chosen. Next, one defines the area of a polygonal region as the sum of the areas of the triangular regions in some decomposition. Of course one has to show that this sum does not depend on the particular decomposition that is used. Given this definition for $\alpha $, it is then a simple matter to show that postulates 1 to 5 are satisfied.
The function $\alpha $ can be defined on a larger domain, which includes circular sectors and disks. But to do this rigorously ones needs the concept of a limit. In the hyperbolic geometry case, one can show the following theorem.
Theorem 8.
If $\alpha $ is a function that satisfies postulates 1 to 4 then there is a $k\mathrm{>}\mathrm{0}$ such that
$$\alpha (R)=k\delta (R)$$ 
for every polygonal region, where $\delta \mathit{}\mathrm{(}R\mathrm{)}$ is the defect of $R$.
References
 1 Edwin E. Moise, Elementary Geometry^{} from an Advanced Standpoint, Third edition, AddisonWesley, 1990
Title  area of a polygonal region 
Canonical name  AreaOfAPolygonalRegion 
Date of creation  20130322 17:00:29 
Last modified on  20130322 17:00:29 
Owner  Mathprof (13753) 
Last modified by  Mathprof (13753) 
Numerical id  12 
Author  Mathprof (13753) 
Entry type  Definition 
Classification  msc 51M25 
Related topic  Area2 
Related topic  InterceptTheorem 
Related topic  BaseAndHeightOfTriangle 
Defines  triangular region 
Defines  polygonal region 
Defines  area of a triangle 