motivation of definition of constructible numbers


In order to understand the significance of constructible numbers and how they are useful in solving problems in Euclidean geometryMathworldPlanetmath, we need to determine how the definitions and properties of these numbers relate to Euclidean geometry.

To start with, let us investigate some properties of 𝔼, the field of real constructible numbers:

  1. 1.

    0,1𝔼;

  2. 2.

    If a,b𝔼, then also a±b, ab, and a/b𝔼, the last of which is meaningful only when b0;

  3. 3.

    If r𝔼 and r>0, then r𝔼.

It turns out that the nonnegative elements of 𝔼 are in one-to-one correspondence with lengths of constructible line segmentsMathworldPlanetmath (http://planetmath.org/Constructible2). Let us determine why this is:

First of all, 0𝔼 and 1𝔼 are self-evident, as these are basic requirements for 𝔼 to be a field. Moreover, 1𝔼 corresponds to the tacit assumption in compass and straightedge construction that a line segment of length 1 is constructible (http://planetmath.org/Constructible2).

Secondly, if a,b𝔼, which should mean that line segments of lengths |a| and |b| are constructible, then we can easily construct line segments of lengths |a+b| and |a-b| by matching up endpointsMathworldPlanetmath of line segments.

Thirdly, if a,b𝔼, then we can construct a line segment of length |ab| by the compass and straightedge construction of similar triangles.

Fourthly, if a,b𝔼 and b0, we can construct a line segment of length 1/|b| by the compass and straightedge construction of inverse point. By the previous paragraph, multiplication by a poses no problems.

Finally, if r𝔼 and r>0, then we can construct a line segment of length r by the compass and straightedge construction of geometric mean, letting a=1 and b=r.

Now to address the definition of 𝔽, the field of constructible numbers:

  1. 1.

    0,1𝔽;

  2. 2.

    If a,b𝔽, then also a±b, ab, and a/b𝔽, the last of which is meaningful only when b0;

  3. 3.

    If z𝔽{0} and arg(z)=θ where 0θ<2π, then |z|eiθ2𝔽.

It turns out that the elements of 𝔽 are in one-to-one correspondence with the constructible points (http://planetmath.org/Constructible2) of the complex planeMathworldPlanetmath. Let us determine why this is:

Rule 1 is similarly justified as above.

In order to justify rule 2, all we need is the justification of rule 2 for 𝔼 along with the notion of copying an angle. For example, if a,b𝔽, then the following picture can be made by copying an angle:

0ba+ba

Finally to justify rule 3. If z𝔽, then |z|𝔼, so we have that |z|𝔼. Since |z|eiθ=z𝔽, we must have that an angle with measure (http://planetmath.org/AngleMeasure) θ is constructible. By the compass and straightedge construction of angle bisectorMathworldPlanetmath, an angle with measure θ/2 is also constructible.

Title motivation of definition of constructible numbers
Canonical name MotivationOfDefinitionOfConstructibleNumbers
Date of creation 2013-03-22 17:16:05
Last modified on 2013-03-22 17:16:05
Owner Wkbj79 (1863)
Last modified by Wkbj79 (1863)
Numerical id 7
Author Wkbj79 (1863)
Entry type Topic
Classification msc 12D15
Classification msc 51M15
Related topic CompassAndStraightedgeConstruction